Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 29th April 2003, 08:25 PM
Merriguy Merriguy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 609
Default

Quite a lot is spoken about False Favourites on this forum and elsewhere. If you are laying your picks this is most important. Conversely, it is surely also important if you are trying to back a winner to try to discern the False Favourites.

Collectively can we come up with a few thoughts on this subject :???:

What do you see as the indicators of a False Favourite?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29th April 2003, 10:21 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,432
Default

I can offer up two criteria for picking false faves.

1. Horses racing first up from a spell are a risk no matter what it's past first up record is like.

2. Horses rising in class (race prizemoney) are often false favourites unless the rest of the field are also all rising in class.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29th April 2003, 10:41 PM
partypooper partypooper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,426
Default

someone else mentioned that a horse not racing within 100 metres of the distance last start, can indicate a false fav. but I would add, "OR" be a distance winner
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29th April 2003, 11:17 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,432
Default

Quote:
On 2003-04-29 22:41, partypooper wrote:
someone else mentioned that a horse not racing within 100 metres of the distance last start, can indicate a false fav. but I would add, "OR" be a distance winner


Statistically speaking, whether a horse won at the distance or on the track is quite insignificant and does not have any relationship to longterm profit or success.

I know quite a few punters that concentrate on distance and track, but the figures do not reflect major importance.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 422,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/07/2025
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30th April 2003, 07:23 AM
Paddy Paddy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 5,783
Default

Along similar lines to EI (oops) I mean Chrome Prince. Horses that start fav after a good run first up often fail to repeat or improve second up.



__________________
Ta me go maith
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30th April 2003, 09:05 AM
osulldj osulldj is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 166
Default

Hi all,

Statistically there are a few indicators that can highlight favourites that win and return less than the average of all favourites. I will run some numbers through my database for the last 4 years and attempt to post some of them over the next few days.

However knowledge of these statistics won't allow you to necessarily profit from them.

Each race and indeed favourite is unique and needs to be treated as such. You need to look and find things that others don't know or tend to discount. Everyone can read the stats.

My own speed and pace figures are my personal tool for finding false favourites.

2YO's and early 3YO's are the horses hyped more than any in the media and betting markets and I find they offer me the best opportunities.

Last Saturday my figures identified Windy Kate at Doomben while having a good chance was no odds on favourite, while Sir Success had a good chance and was at double figure odds in a 6 or 7 horse field....lay Windy Kate on Betfair and back Sir Success at $14...win/win. Prior to that was the Sires Produce where Untouchable was much hyped...my figures showed he only had an outside chance. A few weeks prior to that was the overrated Niello sent out at a prohibitive odds on favourite in the race won by Exceed and Excel...another successful lay.

I Will post some stats on favourites with different form factors over the next couple of days and hopefully they provide some interesting insights.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30th April 2003, 12:26 PM
osulldj osulldj is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 166
Default

Hi all,

Metro favourites for the last 4 years by:

SPELL COUNT

SC SR% POT%
======================
0 29.80% -15.20%
1 30.80% -13.60%
2 31.40% -10.20%
3 30.90% -11.20%
4 28.60% -14.90%
5 28.00% -15.10%
6 27.40% -17.90%
7 29.40% -4.10%
8 28.80% -7.60%
9 26.30% -13.60%

The numbers go on further but the sample sizes are too small.

The same favourites by BARRIER

Barrier SR% POT%
======================
1 32.60% -7.60%
2 31.20% -9.80%
3 29.40% -18.40%
4 29.20% -16.80%
5 31.40% -10.40%
6 32.70% -8.60%
7 27.90% -19.80%
8 28.00% -15.80%
9 27.90% -11.80%
10 28.70% -9.10%
11 28.30% -3.80%
12 24.20% -14.90%
13 23.90% -11.60%
14 25.00% -1.00%
15 11.90% -45.00%
16 24.00% -36.00%

By AGE

Age SR% POT%
======================
2 33.70% -16.20%
3 31.40% -11.90%
4 29.70% -10.50%
5 26.10% -17.10%
6 27.10% -7.20%
7 20.90% -19.90%
8 17.30% -41.70%
9 10.50% -75.30%
10 40.00% 6.00%

By LAST START FIN POS

FP SR% POT%
======================
FS 31.00% -17.30%
1 32.30% -11.50%
2 29.50% -14.20%
3 28.50% -12.80%
4 27.60% -14.30%
5 29.10% -10.10%
6 28.50% -8.40%
7 26.50% -11.40%
8 26.80% -13.60%
9 25.70% -7.00%
10 23.60% -21.60%
11 34.70% 10.20%
12 24.40% -14.80%
13 25.50% -24.50%

The numbers go on but sample sizes are small. FS = First starters.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 1st May 2003, 12:05 PM
xanadu xanadu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 1,492
Default

Chrome Prince, how ya going buddy,

I agree totally with your view on eliminating false favourites by use of the "class" factor. In fact, I would strongly recommend, as an initial filter, to eliminate any pre-post favourite rising in class and field strength. This should improve your winning percentage markedly. Remember, as a percentage punter, like me, if you can eliminate a false(or media hyped) favourite you can then create a dutch-book and back numerous other starters.
It is definitely "food for thought."

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 1st May 2003, 05:07 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,432
Default

Quote:
On 2003-05-01 12:05, xanadu wrote:
Chrome Prince, how ya going buddy,

I agree totally with your view on eliminating false favourites by use of the "class" factor. In fact, I would strongly recommend, as an initial filter, to eliminate any pre-post favourite rising in class and field strength. This should improve your winning percentage markedly. Remember, as a percentage punter, like me, if you can eliminate a false(or media hyped) favourite you can then create a dutch-book and back numerous other starters.
It is definitely "food for thought."

Cheers.


Yeah it's relevant when talking about favourites and false favourites, however, if you're looking at longshots - there's plenty of horses with outstanding form which rise in class and field strength to win at big odds.

You just got to identify value.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 1st May 2003, 07:55 PM
radar radar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: sydney
Posts: 3
Default

osulldj,

Thanks for the interesting figures - makes you wary of favourites. Can I just ask what is a spell count?

radar
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:58 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655