Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 1st March 2004, 02:20 PM
DR RON DR RON is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: victoria
Posts: 562
Default

I think in post from Shaun he mentioned using recent przemoney averages rather than career averages, logic says that it should be a more accurate guide. Does anybody have a database with the prizemoney each start that could compare the two such as strike rates and profit/losson turnover using the last 12 months against career average?

Secondly, could anybody tell me a website with free form history that gives the prizemoney earned each race or at least what each race was worth? I use ozeform but they dont have this info on their horse search site.

Thanks from the doctor.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 1st March 2004, 05:10 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,425
Default

Doc,

I have found that ranking horses by Career API and then by last three starts API is very powerful.

The last three starts is the most indicative, career can be based on one or two good 2yo starts.

You can get prizemoney earned per run and the actual value of the race from Cyberhorse html zip files.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 2nd March 2004, 04:32 AM
anchor anchor is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: nsw
Posts: 83
Default

dr.ron,
it does seem obvious but you'll be disappointed with using last 12 months and/or recent x no. starts.
For about a fair while I was calculating an API over last 10 starts, and overall didn't find an 'edge' over career API.
I then used distance as a factor. So if a horse had won a 2400m race then was resuming over 1200m I didn't include it in the calculated API. The odd race seemed promising but overall again vs career API was disappointing. Even allowing for some 2yo days and high prized restriced races you'll find time spent on API other than career API won't be worth the effort. Of course please find out yourself, and give Chrome Prince's theory a test run. Maybe a Baghwan or Becareful might have some stats to help out.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 2nd March 2004, 04:53 AM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,425
Default

Hi anchor,

I found in my analysis that the last three starts was the most indicative and effective.

Going to more than three or less than three just didn't produce the same good results.

It was also more effective if:

Last Three Starts API was greater than Career API (The horse being in the best form of it's career).

To give you an example favourites that are ranked third by last three starts API and were beaten by less than 1 length last start continue to make a level stakes profit on Saturdays over three and a half years of data with no other filters :wink:

Also this has to be used in conjunction with other factors not on it's own to succeed.



_________________
"The man who can correctly assess Class can have all the money he wants and he only needs a dollar to start". - Pittsburg Phil

[ This Message was edited by: Chrome Prince on 2004-03-02 06:03 ]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 2nd March 2004, 08:09 PM
DR RON DR RON is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: victoria
Posts: 562
Default

Thanks for the input guys, I'll keep plugging away.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:55 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655