#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Is this sort of distance rubbish happening deliberately during the week to make handicapping and picking winners harder ?
CESSNOCK Race 1 : 2 :38 PM MDN C 1150 Race 2 : 3 :13 PM MDN C 1150 Race 3 : 3 :48 PM NEW YE C 1550 Race 4 : 4 :23 PM CL1 C 1550 Race 5 : 4 :58 PM MDN C 1350 Race 6 : 5 :33 PM MDN C 900 Race 7 : 6 :08 PM CL1 C 900 STONY CREEK Race 1 : 1 :10 PM 3 CL1 C 1600 Race 2 : 1 :45 PM CL1 C 1000 Race 3 : 2 :20 PM 3UFMMDN C 1000 Race 4 : 2 :55 PM 3 MDN C 1100 Race 5 : 3 :30 PM CL4 C 1780 Race 6 : 4 :10 PM 3U MDN C 2100 Race 7 : 4 :45 PM CL5 C 2800 Race 8 : 5 :20 PM CL1 N 1780 Not a 1200m anywhere. Albany today has normal distances but it is the exception during the week, not the norm. You hardly ever see these sort of distances on a Sat. Metro card. Last edited by crash : 10th January 2006 at 06:29 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Now it's happening Wed. too. Tomorrow's races:
CANTERBURY Race 1 : 1 :17 PM 3 MDN C 1580 Race 2 : 1 :52 PM 2 F MDN C 1100 Race 3 : 2 :27 PM 3 CGMDN C 1100 Race 4 : 3 :02 PM 3UFMCL3 C 1900 Race 5 : 3 :37 PM 3U 3UP-WL C 1580 Race 6 : 4 :17 PM 4UM CL3 C 1250 Race 7 : 4 :57 PM 4UEGCL3 C 1200 DEVONPORT Race 1 : 12:15 PM CL1 C 1380 Race 2 : 12:55 PM CL1 C 1380 Race 3 : 1 :30 PM CL1 C 1600 Race 4 : 2 :05 PM 3U MDN C 1175 Race 5 : 2 :40 PM 3 MDN C 1175 Race 6 : 3 :15 PM CL2 C 1175 Race 7 : 3 :52 PM DEVONP N 1800 Race 8 : 4 :32 PM CL4 C 1600 Race 9 : 5 :12 PM HCP N 1175 Race 10 : 5 :52 PM CL2 C 1800 GOLD COAST Race 1 : 11:47 AM MDN C 900 Race 2 : 12:25 PM 3UFMMDN C 1300 Race 3 : 1 :00 PM 3UFMMDN C 1300 Race 4 : 1 :35 PM 3UECMDN C 1300 Race 5 : 2 :10 PM CL3 C 1000 Race 6 : 2 :45 PM CL4 C 1800 Race 7 : 3 :25 PM 3 CL6 C 1800 Race 8 : 4 :05 PM CL2 C 1400 Race 9 : 4 :45 PM CL1 C 1200 SANDOWN HILLSIDE Race 1 : 1 :00 PM 3 F 3YF HC C 1000 Race 2 : 1 :35 PM 4UM CL6 N 1000 Race 3 : 2 :10 PM HCP C 2400 Race 4 : 2 :45 PM 4U CL6 C 1300 Race 5 : 3 :20 PM 3 1MW C 1300 Race 6 : 3 :56 PM CL6 C 1700 Race 7 : 4 :36 PM 1MWLY C 1000 Race 8 : 5 :16 PM 4UM CL6 C 1400 VICTORIA PARK Race 1 : 12:37 PM 2 NMW C 1000 Race 2 : 1 :12 PM 3U MDN C 1250 Race 3 : 1 :47 PM CL1 C 1800 Race 4 : 2 :22 PM CL1 C 1250 Race 5 : 2 :57 PM CL3 C 1250 Race 6 : 3 :32 PM CL4 C 2000 Race 7 : 4 :12 PM CL3 C 1600 Race 8 : 4 :52 PM 3U MDN C 1600 You would never see these distances at these tracks on a Sat: 1580m, 1900m at Canterbury and 1300m and 1700m at Sand. Hillside. Not sure about Tasmania [anythings possible down there:-)]. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
By my reckoning Cessnock only ever races at these distances: 950 1150 1350 1550 2100 http://www.racenet.com.au/cessnock/...?venue=cessnock |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() False rail.................
Some tracks re-position the barriers to keep distances constant. Other tracks leave the barriers where they are and re-adjust the distance. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Most of these weird distances never existed [on any track any day of the week] not that long ago. How hard can it be to measure out a standard distance just like they do on Sat. at Metro meetings? What, they never adjust city track rails in or out ?
Pity the poor ************ with a mid-week form guide and only a horses last 3 starts on it that says: Starts at distance [1580m]: NIL. Wins at Distance: Nil. But we lucky lot with PC's see the runner has 3 wins from 4 starts at 1600m. This distance garbage all started with the intro of 1300m races, then came the 900m after the 'rare' 1000m became common [yes youngsters, there was a time that distance was a rare one, not the most common]. I recently saw listed [forgotten where] a couple of 800m races [not trials]. How long will it be before we are racing 1/4 horses over 600m? Weird distances are just another nail in punter's coffins and more variables in handicapping as far as I can see. Cheers, Crash Last edited by crash : 10th January 2006 at 10:31 AM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I agree with you Crash,it does make life more difficult.
I can only guess that with laser technology they can place the false rail in almost any position and calculate the distance in a few minutes.I think that previously there were set positions for the false rail and distances were more standard. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yep, you've nailed it there I think syllabus23. Cost saving.
Why pay someone to measure out common standard distances, when they can just adjust the declared distance? Stuff the punters. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
That's not quite correct Crash, they have had these weird distances for some years now, e.g. in 1996 @ Flemington they had races over 1405m 1410m; 1415m; 1418m; 1419m; 1422m; a listed race over 1604m; 1618m; 1624m - I could go on with even more over the last ten years just @ Flemington. Back in October 2005 they ran a race @ Flemington over 1720m won by Command 'n Conquer on a Saturday worth $75,000. Same day they ran the Edward Manifold over 1610m & yet another race over 1410m while in July last year there was a race @ the same track over 1440m. At Sandown (old track) they ran 1300m races as far back as 1996, if not even further back, while @ the new Hillside track they have been running 1300m races since in opened. We mightn't like it but these 'weird' distances are all part of a punter's lot nowadays. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() We get the same thing here, but they dodge it by calling a race for example: "About 7 furlongs". A furlong being 1/8 of a mile of course. Makes comparing times or speed ratings less meaningful.
Regards, Glenn
__________________
There's something happening here, what it is ain't exactly clear. Retired or retarded? Much the same. I'm retired... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Gee La Mer,
I took you for an old ************ too. 1996? [yesterday]. How about what was happening in 1986? or 76? or ....na, we won't go there. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|