Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 28th September 2006, 01:17 PM
xanadu xanadu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 1,492
Default Demise Of On Course Bookmakers

Where are the old-style bookies who did their own form and would accordingly "let punters on" or would lay certain horses because, in their opinion, certain runners were a good risk?
They were form students but where is this breed now?
Invariably, on-course bookies will follow the opening tote price and they wonder why punters are deserting the tracks in droves!
Guess what....? If a punter considers that he can secure good value at the track then he/she will attend the races and hopefully pay for their day out. It amazes me that on-course bookies cannot grasp this simple truism.
The question then is: do on-course bookies deserve our sympathy for their ultimate decrease or even demise?
Or, more specifically, does their future lay in their own hands?
I am of the opinion that they have no-one else to blame but themselves, e.g. each way bookies rarely bet 1/4 odds for the place but rather, bet tote odds....we all know why!
Isn't the solution clear to see for these participants in the racing industry....it is to the rest of us.
So, please, no whinging about turnover tax and the like....if they wanted to give it a go, they may very well succeed in their business venture by offering attractive odds to on-course patrons.
Their future is in their own hands!
Any comments for or against?

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28th September 2006, 02:31 PM
Mr. Logic Mr. Logic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xanadu
So, please, no whinging about turnover tax and the like....if they wanted to give it a go, they may very well succeed in their business venture by offering attractive odds to on-course patrons.
Their future is in their own hands!
Any comments for or against?


Unlike a tote, a bookie is NOT GUARANTEED a profit on every race. Unlike a tote a bookie isn't allowed to lower the odds of your bet to GUARANTEE a profit from the race because more money has come for the horse.

That being the case, turnover tax is an absolute killer because the tax IS NOT based on profits.

Have a look at the bookie's odds for Melbourne and Sydney on Saturdays. In most races you can do better with the bookies unless you're speculating backing horses at $10.00 and longer odds.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28th September 2006, 03:15 PM
xanadu xanadu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 1,492
Default

Sure, your comments are noted with the appropriate understanding of the current situation.
However, shouldn't the entrepreneur 'think outside the square" to attract more clients and ensuing higher turnover?
With the current "party" atmosphere encouraged by our forward-thinking STC & AJC, shouldn't bookies try to encourage some of these party girls/boys to have a bet by initiating more exotic bets whereby they can win a "fortune" for a minimal outlay?
The scope of this is unlimited and I, personally, have numerous ideas how to increase turnover-but there is currently no incentive for me to disclose these thoughts.
Let's face it, the era of the hard-nosed grizzled punter is now gone, so, we have to adapt to the changing environment as we proceed into the future.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28th September 2006, 04:53 PM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default

'The demise of the Bookie' is not the fault of the Bookie, but the punters who deserted them in increasing droves when the TAB opened for business.

Mostly, no longer can they lay a fair book because for them to do that they need punter volume which we increasingly denied them.

The pokie industry and sports betting lost them even more punters and the racetracks didn't help by jumping on that profit bandwagon, opening shop at the racetrack and competing for the race day betting dollar, which was once wagered with the bookie.

Most bookies are decent guys and mostly battlers too, with only a select few making big bucks.
Sure they realize they could compete with the tote by offering better or equal odds [their not idiots], but they also realize that because of the new punting paradigm above that now exists, seriously competing with the tote would put them in the dole queue quick smart !

Last edited by crash : 28th September 2006 at 04:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28th September 2006, 08:16 PM
Rain Lover Rain Lover is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 94
Default

Please stop it guys, I'm running out of hankies.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30th September 2006, 01:58 PM
xanadu xanadu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 1,492
Wink

Aaah!.....we live in a cynical world!
crash-we are living in a world where technology and recreation and lifestyle choices are changing at an incredible rate. Therefore, to survive in the highly competitive world of wagering all participants must adapt to the changing environment. By doing this they may stay in touch and even manage to manipulate the odds in their favour.

Cheers.

Last edited by xanadu : 30th September 2006 at 02:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30th September 2006, 02:29 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,426
Default

If the bookies offered better than tote odds on a regular basis, punters would never have deserted them.

Greed killed them - just look at the 130% plus markets.

To stay alive in any industry, you have to be competitive with the opposition.

Instead they try to make a killing of the mugs, partygoers, spring carnivals.

Any astute punter will not be conned, so the greedy bookies never get regular business.

I'm not talking about all bookies, just the one's that take advantage and then cry because they have no turnover.

The same is happening with betting exchanges versus the TABs, punters see value elsewhere, so the TABs are left with the small time punters.
Instead of looking at the situation from a business perspective and offering a competitive product, they reduce services and increase takeout.

It is not good business practice.

I'm guessing that any increase in TAB turnover comes from those who have laid horses on betting exchanges
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 412,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/12/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg

Last edited by Chrome Prince : 30th September 2006 at 02:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30th September 2006, 02:46 PM
xanadu xanadu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 1,492
Default

You make some good points CP.
I believe that the on-course bookies hold their destiny in their own hands.
If they are unwilling to adapt to the changing environment they will soon be left behind or even facing extinction.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 1st October 2006, 07:28 AM
go4it
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

xanadu,

have to disagree with you there.

oncourse bookmakers cannot compete with the online corporate bookies any more.they are too restricted by out of date laws.at the ajc wagering forum recently,con kafataris stated that he is losing business hand over foot because once he leaves the course he is not allowed to take a bet.so if he has a regular client who has had a winning day and wants to bet on the trots,greyhounds etc.he cannot take a bet.it is fairly obvious to me that the powers that be don't give a stuff about oncourse bookies,all they want is an amalgamated national TAB which they can ride roughshod over and make megabucks out of.

God help us if that ever eventuates.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 1st October 2006, 08:58 AM
La Mer La Mer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 578
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by go4it
xanadu,

have to disagree with you there.

oncourse bookmakers cannot compete with the online corporate bookies any more.they are too restricted by out of date laws.at the ajc wagering forum recently,con kafataris stated that he is losing business hand over foot because once he leaves the course he is not allowed to take a bet.so if he has a regular client who has had a winning day and wants to bet on the trots,greyhounds etc.he cannot take a bet.it is fairly obvious to me that the powers that be don't give a stuff about oncourse bookies,all they want is an amalgamated national TAB which they can ride roughshod over and make megabucks out of.

God help us if that ever eventuates.

That may well be the case in NSW/Qld but not Victoria as they commenced their bookies on line service this week.

There are a number of bookies involved offering a wide range of services from racing to sports.

Last edited by Moderator 3 : 1st October 2006 at 08:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:10 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655