Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Sports and Gambling
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25th November 2005, 03:43 PM
discipline pays discipline pays is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 184
Default Aust vs Windies 3rd test

Can anyone explain why ponting is so reluctant to bowl Macgill ? Does anyone think it is due to a loyalty to Warne ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25th November 2005, 05:52 PM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,965
Default

It's not just Ponting though, is it? It's the selectors as well. It doesn't matter how many wickets MacGill gets, if they decide they only want one spinner, Warne is ALWAYS first choice. In the 11 test matches where they've both played together, MacGill has taken 60 wickets to Warne's 48 and at a much better average. Warne is undeniably a far better batsman and fielder than MacGill, but as far as bowling ability goes, I don't think Warne should automatically be first choice.

Last edited by Sportz : 25th November 2005 at 05:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25th November 2005, 05:59 PM
Dirk Gently Dirk Gently is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 55
Default

I was always asking myself why McGill was so often overlooked until I read a snippet in the paper about the post-match celebrations in the dressing room......it turns out that McGill will celebrate with a nice cool glass of....WINE!
Surely the rest of the team can't trust him!

I AM SO GLAD that Lara has come good as I predicted but I am ****ED OFF that it is one test too late to influence my bank balance. Oh well, I'm going to enjoy this test anyway. Cheers to all.
PS you can trust me...I'll drink anything!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26th November 2005, 03:59 AM
discipline pays discipline pays is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 184
Default

I notice that the aussies are still very short to win this test IAS has them at 1.38 which IMO is a bit short.


Think they will probably still win but it is hard to win batting 2nd when opponents make 400 odd batting first.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26th November 2005, 06:04 AM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,965
Default

I can't believe the odds!!! A team in the West Indies' position would normally be nothing like the price they are at the moment. I assume the bookies just aren't willing to risk it given what's happened earlier in the series and I suppose they don't believe that the West Indies can bowl Australia out twice.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26th November 2005, 10:50 AM
Mr J Mr J is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 759
Default

I love it. I was really hoping that Lara brought something this series and that the windies stood up (I want em to win actually). Sad that the windies aren't the threat they used to be.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28th November 2005, 01:00 PM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by discipline pays
Can anyone explain why ponting is so reluctant to bowl Macgill ? Does anyone think it is due to a loyalty to Warne ?


Well, I have to say that today it's been quite ridiculous.

Warne's bowled very well this morning picking up 5 wickets. But it would have been pretty disappointing if he couldn't manage to get 5 wickets seeing as he's bowled unchanged for the whole session on a spinning pitch while the other spinner in the team didn't even get one over.

Last edited by Sportz : 28th November 2005 at 01:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 28th November 2005, 01:12 PM
discipline pays discipline pays is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 184
Default

ridiculous on two fronts.... bowling warne unchanged and not bowling macgill .... and how about the umpiring this series ? it only seemed like yesterday that everyone was complaining about what a rough deal australia got in ashes.... well what about this series ? talk about kicking a team when they are down !! windies have been smashed by umpires ... the australians intimidate the umpires
and complain when they dont get it all their own way . IMO that is a bit disappointing
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 28th November 2005, 01:25 PM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,965
Default

I don't think you can blame the Australians. If the umpires aren't competent enough to make each decision on it's merits, then it's not the Australians' fault. I didn't like the way Lee ran down the pitch celebrating before the umpire even put his finger up. That's not right, but it's still up to the umpire to not get influenced by the players.

Still no MacGill. I can't believe it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 28th November 2005, 02:23 PM
discipline pays discipline pays is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 184
Default

I dont BLAME the aussies, just dont like it either ! Am looking forward to the proteas coming out, might be a better test.


a bit of a false sense of security after being outplayed in england ..... and still having major problems in middle order
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:38 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655