|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Not sure if anyone has the capabilities to run past data over this, but i feel it would be profitable. Rules are:
1. DFS 100 top rated 2. Won last start by at least 1 length 3. Field Strength (FS) is a minus figure 4. Not going up in weight by more than 2kg 5. Same track, distance & jockey as last start. I know it would throw up mainly warm favs, but i would class them 'true' favs.
__________________
All generalizations are dangerous. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() How about also 15 - 18 points.
Here is an old one using their info. TOP OF BEST FORM PANEL TOP OR 2nd ON RECENT FORM PANEL IF TOP ON RECENT FORM CAN BE 1- 2 OR 3 ON DISTANCE PANEL IF 2nd ON RECENT FORM MUST BE TOP ON DISTANCE PANEL 15 - 18 POINTS Cheers. darky |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() THE DFS SYSTEM HAS THROWN UP:
Caulfield. R1 N3 JUKEBOX JOHNNY Doomben. R8 N3 NOBLE GAZE - Slight tweak to the system is the selections don't have to have won at the track & distance last start, but have to have won at track & distance before.
__________________
All generalizations are dangerous. Last edited by YoungBuck : 18th August 2006 at 08:39 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() A couple more at Belmont.
R2 N1 DOYOUDARE R4 N1 MAGICAL GOLD
__________________
All generalizations are dangerous. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jukebox Johnny scratched.
__________________
All generalizations are dangerous. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Doomben.
NOBLE GAZE 1st W:$3.00 P:$1.60 Belmont MAGICAL GOLD 2nd (lost on protest) P:$1.50 DOYOUDARE u/placed Got a good feeling about this system.
__________________
All generalizations are dangerous. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi Guys,
Is there an equivalent of the DFS 100 in the everyrace ratings (old Wizard). There is the concensus, wrat and trat. Thanks Steve |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Can't see any selections today. Don't know Dawson.
__________________
All generalizations are dangerous. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Can't see any selections today.
__________________
All generalizations are dangerous. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() These system rules may be too strict as it is not throwing up many bets at all.
It might be tweaked slightly so there are more bets, hopefully without effecting profitablility.
__________________
All generalizations are dangerous. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|