|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi Wesmip
I wonder if you could run a query on last start winners. All days. All classes. Price to 5/1. a) Winning margin to 1 length b) Winning margin more than 1 length. With thanks Salty |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Not a problem ... see below Quote:
Selections: 7524 Win Strike Rate : 25% WIN ROT : 86% (loss of 14%) Quote:
Selections: 7435 Win Strike Rate : 29% WIN ROT : 91% (loss of 9%) So in case you want a few more run here are a couple more lengths : More than 2 lengths ( does not include 2 lengths): Selections: 3737 Win Strike Rate : 32% WIN ROT : 94% (loss of 6%) More than 3 lengths ( does not include 3 lengths): Selections: 1866 Win Strike Rate : 32% WIN ROT : 91% (loss of 9%) 4 lengths or higher: Selections: 1141 Win Strike Rate : 33% WIN ROT : 95% (loss of 5%) 5 lengths or higher: Selections: 613 Win Strike Rate : 36% WIN ROT : 98% (loss of 2%) Hope that helps out ... Good Luck. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It certainly does. I just want to work on an extra angle or two. What amount of time do these results refer to?
Thankyou again Salty |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Wes, that's really interesting stuff, as I spend half of my time trying to isolate VERY simple systems that break even or just a bit better, i.e. 1 or 2 rules.
One thing there that intriges me though, those stats are obviously for the next start, so what interests me is the NEXT start again, especially if it failed after the win, and also if it's worth looking at the place with all of the above? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() WESMIP.
I wonder if you could run me something? The rule is it has to be TAB No 1. And the other rule is it has to start at around $4 or over. Thanks. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Wed. 10 Oct. Albury r10/3 [5w] 1.90p r8/9 1.80p r7/8 1.40p r6/1 unp r5/8 unp Belmont r9/13 2.60p r8/5 1.80p r7/4 unp r6/2 2p r5/2 1.60p r4/1 1.50p r2/9 1.60p Strathalbyn r7/6 [5.30w] 2p r6/2 unp r5/3 1.80p Ballarat r8/9 1.80p r7/13 2.60p r6/7 [5w] 1.80p r5/3 unp Work out the 2 simple rules to this Party and you'll have a nice little place system that more than breaks even [keep it to yourself folks]. No, no clues. Last edited by crash : 11th October 2007 at 07:41 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Nice, Crash....and as you say very simple. Anyone who follows your thoughts on the forum would have no difficulty in working it out .
How far back can you suggest it has worked? Or was yesterday just a special day? Last edited by Merriguy : 11th October 2007 at 10:26 AM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ok after further analysis I have no idea what the two rules are....
oh well... good luck to those who worked it out ... but I did come across something else I found interesting so thanks for sharing crash. Good Luck. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
2.5 years |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Well that isn't as easy to test but Quote:
The results were pretty much in line with the win stats. For instance greater then 2 lengths gave a return of 95% as opposed to 94%. For 5 lengths or higher the place results was a return of 99%. Good Luck |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|