Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 7th February 2008, 07:14 AM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default Systems, win and place %!

From time to time, I'm asked by former clients to test their system that behaves erratically.
This last one was based on win and place %, days to last start plus a few other unique angles he worked out.
This system, although in profit, had the tendency to bring up horses at long odds, but they inevitably failed to perform.
Any guesses why?
Good luck
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 7th February 2008, 07:57 AM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default

Considering that any method of predicting winners is always going to be a partially imprecise exercise, things can always go astray.

The lack of truly run races [pace] in the eastern states -especially in Sydney and Melb. - have become a handicappers nightmare, so I guess it would be throwing a lot of systems out of whack too. The form of runners is almost impossible to handicap or compute, if the race pace is not true. It's become so bad, that I'm thinking of switching all my betting to WA only.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 7th February 2008, 08:17 AM
Racer Racer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lomaca
but they inevitably failed to perform.
Any guesses why?
Good luck


Maybe the fact that horses are at the worst level of quality\capability
in 50 years - there are still multi thousands of runners but they are not
worth two bob.

I mean relative to one another's ability it's a wonder
they can't at least perform reasonably, regardless of how qualityless.

99% of races at present one would not even give a cursory glance and this damned EI did not help the state of affairs - how long
it will take to pick up again is anyone's guess - it needs a rapid FIND
of top NZ or even pommie sires, but I just don't see either possible
in a hurry.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 7th February 2008, 10:59 AM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,330
Smile

IOMACA

Are the selections lower down in the weights ( below 55 kg)

Below 55kg have appalling strike rates.

Cheers.
darky
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 7th February 2008, 12:29 PM
Silver_and_sand Silver_and_sand is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 335
Default That's an interesting observation DarkyDog.

I just checked my system, and those selections below 55kg definitely had a lower strike rate, but their average price was nearly $3 more than those 55kg or more, so it balances out a little.

System selections 55kg or more:
23.8% strike rate
$9.70 ave. winner

System selections less than 55kg:
15.6% strike rate
$12.62 ave. winner

Are others noticing the same thing with their systems too?

Given the better strike rate, maybe I should be betting a little more on those carrying 55kg or more. Thanks for the tip.
__________________
...time held me green and dying, though I sang in my chains like the sea. - Dylan Thomas
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:08 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655