I have been having very good success with the neurals on the weaker fields. I bet more than half the runners in boxed quinellas and trifectas. It appears these weaker fields produce good divvies. Yesterday I snared the trifecta (and of course the quinella) on Gosford R6 which paid $5,500, and five others that paid inxs of $500. Now that I'm listing the selections here the method will most likely fall due to the forum curse. Anyway, I'll give it a go.

Goulburn 8 nos. 1, 3, 6, 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
Goulburn R9 nos. 1, 3, 4, 8, 9, 14, 15, 16
Ararat R5 nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 12, 14
Ararat R6 nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12
Ararat R8 nos. 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 13, 14, 15
Ararat R9 nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12
Narromine R4 nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 12
Narromine R5 nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11
Narromine R7 nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 13, 17
Narromine R8 nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11
Ipswich R2 nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12
Ipswich R9 nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 16

Quinella outlay of $346
Trifecta outlay of $4,074.

As a matter of interest, if every quinella/trifecta loses today, I will still be in profit.

Fingers crossed.

No wonder you're winning. You're picking 3/4 of each field.

Very true. The minimum amount of selections is more than half the field and the maximum is limited to 75%.

I'm more or less 'buying" the quinella and trifecta. The size of the divvies are what I'm hoping/betting will keep the method in profit. So far so good.

I have also been laying with success the shortest non-selection if it is $11 or less. I've only had two accidents so far - one was the fave and the other was the second-fave.

ahh the neurals, what a fantastic tool...i've had a system with them thats been profitable for the last couple of years...great stuff and FREE

I find them (so far) very inconsistent. Its good that you're profiting from them.

If you don't mind me asking - what types of bets are you using the neurals for?

Win

i only find them greatly inconsistent with the TIME rating which i ignore