RACE 1

3 ALPINE PLAYER $3.8
8 PAKENHAM LASS $5.2
7 BEAUTIFUL NOISE $7.2
2 MISS NAH WEE $7.2
4 SONADOR MISS $10
5 SIR ONYX $12
1 BLOW A KISS $14
6 MIZZY MALDINI $33

EXACTAS
3,8 - 3,8 for $1
3,8 - 7,2 for 50 cents

5 TEXEM $2.1
2 BUDGIE LASS $3.2
1 GOTTA WIN ONE $8.5
4 PEDRO'S SHOUT $16
3 MAGIC GEORGE $33
6 REECE'S RAMPAGER $80
7 CRAFTY SHIRAZ $250

Flexi 4

5 - 1,2 - 1,2,4 - 1,2,4,3 for $4 worth
2 - 5,1 - 5,1,4 - 5,1,4,3 for $2.50 worth

7 MASTER HUGH $2.7
2 CRUISE AWAY LASS $5
4 RUN RAMPANT $7.6
8 SIR LEE $9
1 SALEM SIYAN $10
3 RIVERDALE COWBOY $20
5 STONELEIGH $33

Flexi 4
7 - 2,4,1,8 - 2,4,1,8 - 2,4,1,8 for $6 worth

Split times adjusted to the Meadows
1 5.23
2 5.15
3 5.19
4 5.13
5 5.20

7 5.25
8 5.20
2,3,4 have the early speed, seemingly the only danger early is the #1 pushing off the track and hampering the #2.
#5 longtime since it showed it best, has lost a lot of weight, may get a cruisey run in the middle with the dog outside it scratched.

Box Payoff Rank
1 $9.71 4
2 $2.61 1
3 $9.39 3
4 $3.69 2
5 $26.85 6

7 $13.44 5
8 $40.05 7

I haven't had any success in isolating the Winning Races from the Losing ones in my studies.
I figured quality of runners and amount of data available were good criteria, but I been trying to deny I was wrong, but my Bank Account over the years testifies that it ain't true.

Why race 8

Look at the Favourite dog, and check out what Factors have made it the Favourite with the Public.
It's not Time and it's not Class, its is Lengths behind winner or just sum of it's finishing positions as simple as that.

I know how the public will wager on the type of subset, so it's a good race to me