|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
1 - 3 - 4 - 6 -10 (minimum acceptable price $6)
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hope you don't mind, these are my rated prices.
Code:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not at all Shaun.
Always like to see another Professionals opinion. Cheers darky |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
3 - 10 - 4 -1
I took 1 - 4 - 6 Ah well Shaun .We did but try. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was listening on the radio and heard the number 18 was moving up, i backed it at 65 the only runner i didn't back from my 5 was the winner because it was way under my price.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
What you need to do is have a closer look as to why you had it rated obviously too high today. If your ratings were the only method that suggested it wouldn't run well , then it may pay you to modify your methods somewhat , but make sure any adjustments are justifiable, not a suck it and see approach. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Might have a real crack at these better class races Shaun.
Cheers darky |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
i might just do that moee but it is a funny game, some times i have cases like that then other times it is like the last at Bendigo
Code:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Or the Gold Coast meeting using the r+s price asessed.
111.25% POT Cheers darky |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Maybe leave it. With my handicapping , I get fairly intimately involved with the animals. Their quirks and perks. For an hour of study per Race you would expect to notice a lot. As you spend little time on massive amounts of races, your best approach would be to simply monitor your bottom line before tinkering or tampering. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|