Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Sports and Gambling
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 6th February 2005, 08:03 PM
Floydyboy Floydyboy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 982
Default ???

Whats wrong with this ************ government I just went to spodds to see what the prices were in the one dayer pressed a button and I get a notification about how we cant bet "in-running" you can of course bet by phone but not on the internet what sort of ********e is this ....god this makes me cranky ....of course phone bets have a minimum wager rule (usually $50) ....dont they realise that its 2005 not 19 ************ 65 ......who can I bitch to about this to .......it makes me so ************ cranky ....I can understand their paranoia about betfair but we cant even do it in our own backyard arggghhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 6th February 2005, 09:37 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

Some bloke got 6 months for killing a cat.
If he paid the vet $40 there wouldn't have been a problem.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 6th February 2005, 09:40 PM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,983
Default

Floydy, it's been like that for a few years. Surprised you haven't been caught out before. It's ridiculous.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 6th February 2005, 09:44 PM
Floydyboy Floydyboy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 982
Default

Thanks for that moeeeee..............If he hadnt of backed St Kilda last year he might have had the $40

Last edited by Floydyboy : 6th February 2005 at 09:45 PM. Reason: add
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 6th February 2005, 09:52 PM
Floydyboy Floydyboy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 982
Default

Ive always been perplexed as to why fast bowlers dont just bowl full pitched (yorkers)deliveries to tailenders when the scores are tight I know that if the length isnt correct that the ball coud be a full toss or end up in the slot but the tailenders dont usually have the capacity to deal with those sort of balls..and it seems to me the best way to restrict scoring and if your at the sticks your always a chance of knocken em over..... well there ya go the last wickets just gone it wasnt a full length but it stayed low and got the desired results

Last edited by Floydyboy : 6th February 2005 at 09:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 6th February 2005, 10:31 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

No.It wasn't me Floydy,honest.
But I mean to say is the laws are there for a reason,just cause we can't see it don't mean there ain't a good one.

Go the Bombers!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 6th February 2005, 10:43 PM
Floydyboy Floydyboy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 982
Default

Haha... Goodnight
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:50 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655