|
|
To advertise on these forums, e-mail us. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
this is the worst most biased track i ve ever seen. may not even bet there next week but sydney racing like usual goes from millionaires one week to paupers the next.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
maybe its a track for good jockeys with initiative.
some of the rides were like us punters. it would be sheer good luck if they won. e.g. tru glow natural blitz also shocked at brief embrace performance. i as usual backed it drew very good barrier last round the turn. oh well there's always next week. (did get in top swing) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I watched the first three races at Caulfield on Sat 11/10. I then knew it was going to be a front running day for the sprint races. I decided not to back any thing in any races 1600m or over. I had originally picked Halibery to place only. When I saw there was a bias I got on her to win as well. I also had her and Dantana in for the quinella.
I say keep the bias at Caulfield, it is one factor I can use to my advantage as punter. I expect that the MRC will attempt to 'fix' the track bias but with the prospect of little rain until after the Caulfield Cup I can't see them succeeding al that well (but then again I am no horticulturalist). may the horse be with you Seeker |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|