 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
#21
16th April 2008, 03:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Just a typo, I meant 3rd or 4th start. 
|
|
#23
17th April 2008, 06:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The results all tracks where:
DEVONPORT [s] 6/7 [$8.30p] DOOMBEN 5/7 x 6/13 x 7/12,13 x KALGOORLIE 3/7,9 x 4/10 [$3.50w $1.50p] 5/10 x 7/12 x RANDWICK-KENSING [s] 4/13,14 [4.50p] 6/10 [$15.40w $4.10p],11 x 7/12 x SANDOWN-HILLSIDE 2/9 x 4/10 x STRATHALBYN 7/6,7 x 8/8 x 9/7x Taking out the slow tracks, a losing day. Maybe they should be left in [?] Last edited by crash : 17th April 2008 at 06:58 AM.
|
|
#24
17th April 2008, 09:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Lightweights can have an advantage on Slow/Heavy tracks so how about including them IF they have been placed on slow or heavy tracks previously. cheers ...mancunian
|
|
#25
17th April 2008, 09:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll just note S or H meeting and throw the results in as above. I won't worry about prev. wins in H or S yet. [too many filters too soon] If the horses are running in those conditions. The trainers might know something we don't!
|
|
#27
17th April 2008, 03:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Onya Crash
I can count the number of double figure place bets that i have collected on in my life on two hands.
Today -- two in half an hour. Back Tracks is the longest price placegetter that I have ever backed. Thanks Crash
|
|
#28
17th April 2008, 03:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
HAWKESBURY [s]
8/10 OUR CHINA PLATE [$12.70p] ADELAIDE R6 BACK TRACKS [$11.70p] Both were over 50/1 however, so I'm not claiming them. If I'd have bet all horses over 50/1. I think the system would be in loss. However, for wet tracks I don't know. I certainly think your on to something though re wet tracks and perhaps change the odds for the wet. Last edited by crash : 17th April 2008 at 04:09 PM.
|
|
#29
17th April 2008, 04:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Back Tracks
It paid 16.80 where I backed it and a couple of dollars more in NSW.
Unitab punters got way under the odds. It was only $34 SP with the bookie. Our China Plate at $81 was a genuine outsider. I had decided to ignore the 50/1 rule but, based on what you say, I'll think about it some more.
|
|
#30
17th April 2008, 05:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Point is I think your grabbing exceptions outside the rules. If you had bet all those exceptions since I started the system, you wouldn't be looking so good.
The wet tracks though, might apply. keep it up!
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
