#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I have said enough about weights previously, to go over it again. and maybe my other post was misinterpreted, check the #1 it's past form. go back to its sixth start you will see it's comeback from a 2 month spell its last 5 starts are "different" to its start prior to the spell.(that tells me something about this dog) Its last start it lead by how far down the back straight, yet reaching the top turn it was a shot duck, the the eventual winner and placegetters all nearly fell over themselves at the 1st turn. To me this dog will be a classic dog of being "overbet" and judging by how you have read the form, thats how it will be.. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I know nothing about dogs, don't even kow how to find their weight for the current race, but I made good profits by analysing the available form info on the TAB under "Form". So, Cranbourne race 8 I'll have $20 on No.5. to win. Even if it loses I'm still ahead by a fair margin today and I treat greys as a hobby. PS anyone point me to the weight sheet? much appreciated. Good luck |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Good luck, too Racing is my normal go too, but the dogs are the cream on top, they allow one to sharpen ones skills in race pattern prediction, and developing good wagering habits, the same methods employed with the dogs are the way to go with Racing. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() http://www.grv.org.au/Statistics/WeightSheet.aspx
Can you briefly mention how you decided on #5 Lomaca, and why $20? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The tales I could tell about punters' wagering habits! (don't ask, that business is behind us now praise be God) Let it suffice that even a system that's losing by betting on every selection can be turned into a goldmine if good records are kept and sound betting is employed. But you can't tell punters!! The smart ones learn by listening and by experience. Good luck to all |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
moeee, my normal wager on horses is $200. Greys being a hobby I though $20 is appropriate. Cheers |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
oh oh moeee... 6 DREWSTER 17.60 3.70 5 PURE PEACHES 1.80 2 AUTUMN BLING 2.60 |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
race 10 Cranbourne Nos. 1 and 5 $10 each for win. the pink might upset, but so what? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
???? The RED led to the 1st turn by 3 lengths!!!! LOMACA, you pick good. But ain't it annoying when the #1 beat the Pink last time they met, yet in Race 10 , there was a Form Reversal of perhaps 10 lengths between them ![]() Last edited by moeee : 2nd May 2011 at 06:01 PM. Reason: spelling |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]() mooee "LOMACA, you pick good. But ain't it annoying when the #1 beat the Pink last time they met, yet in Race 10 , there was a Form Reversal of perhaps 10 lengths between them"
I have NO idea about the two races you're talking about, but it's not possible that there was a "form reversal" ..... doesn't happen that bad at the dogs. different distance (have to be 150 mtrs?) ..... not the track. Checked in the run (YUP). Bad box (again not 10 lengths). Yup ..... some of these could lead to 10 lengths (at the extreme) but NOT a form reversal ! mooee, you seem to take an interest in the dogs, I don't know the race, nor the dogs in question, so maybe you could provide some info as to how the difference was 10 lengths ..... and it wasn't a form reversal. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|