A question to those using time rating.

I gave it away some time ago as I just couldn't make it work.
I used only on shorter distances as per common wisdom.

Never having changed any of the algorithm I use, I started to try it again on distances over 1600M a few month ago and to my surprise it performs exceedingly well.
What have I done wrong-right? Or is the short distance belief just a myth?
Similar experience anyone, or is it just an ephemeral fluke?

I know of many time raters that do well, especially using 200m sectionals of a race, measuring fastest time and acceleration.
I honestly think it's more suited to dirt tracks in the usa.
Turf courses, the pace is different and horses really aren't extended til much later.
But if you found an edge, then you may be looking at times differently to traditional methods.
I do know that when Beyer came here, he couldn't get his successful time ratings strategy to work here.

__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 413,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/01/2025
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg

Looking differently at " time" may mean trying to understand "how long is a race"?
and then one may contemplate "when is a race over"?

I do it a bit differently because sectionals are still not available for all races, but I compared and it's not too different.
Yes I think you are right about that, to have consistent speed rating one has to have consistent track conditions, and there is no way we can have that on turf. I do allow for track speed on different tracks and track conditions though.
I have a few books on speed including that of Beyer's and tried to follow them as close as I could.

Don't know about any edge though, I think it's nothing more than a temporary thing. I used it on short distances for years without great success.
True I did get some good priced winners but not enough to cover the losses.
Generally I found my top speed selection would take off as a rocket lead almost all the way and fade on the last hundred metres.

I only started to look at them again when, by accident, I left my rating programme sit on time rating and found good results on longer distances.

Maybe woof43 is right, and in longer races the jockey has better control on how the race is run and genuine speed becomes more prominent?

Time only will tell. (Ouch!)

Maybe now with Betfair, you can lay these horses in running when they are a reasonably low price.

The Ocho
Can't bring my head around to this laying caper.

I do know that my top time rated selections are not profitable for backing, but at the prices they are running maybe they would be losers at laying?
I mean if one comes in at $25 that is a fair chunk of money to pay out?

Any easy way to test it?

A couple of points you have touched on above, one always needs to know what track variant needs to be applied and to which times (sometimes the state of track/track variant gets to a point when even a track variant cannot be applied, you don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand why that happens).
When the winner crosses the finish line say for a 1400m race, we assume he has run the full distance of 1400m for that race.
Now if this same horse competed against the track record holder (Fixed Standard, not that one would use the Track record as the Fixed standard) say for arguments sake at Rosehill the standard is 81.38 secs you create a Track constant Time X distance = 113,932 we can then look back at say a recent winner on the 31st Dec. who won in 83.43 secs divide this into the track constant = 1,365.5mtrs so if i compare this winner to the fixed standard we can see the distance difference with this 1 crosshair (everything should be measured in distance completed, not time).
There are 3 crosshairs that are used then to define the ability matrix of a horse,fixed, relative and a moving standard once these are defined we then can look at sectionals and then construct how how each race may unfold.

But then again all this is getting complicated, just stick with what your already doing.

Your ability to turn simple into complicated is frighteningly amazing Woof43.

P.S. Can't recall if I replied , but thanks for the complicated sheets.
I have filed them in my "some things are best left to experts" Folder.

I reckon I,ll look at Time Ratings when the Official Race Club Handicappers incorporate them into their ratings.(Which is never)

what makes you think that they aren't now

Theoretical example:
2 horses win at 1200M on same day in different races.
carry equal weights - similiar or same class - maiden for example
one breaks the course record.
how do you think they would line up next time?
of course the quicker one would get more weight.

cheers

aussie