Hmm.....
$2402.78 / 999 placegetters = ave return of $2.40...... on price rank <=2 selections.
Surely impossible.


The same filters when run for the WIN come up with
1480 selections
501 winners
SR: 33.85%
LOT: 0.44%
Ave return: $2.95

Indeed Lux

__________________
"Now let me get this straight - Whatever I do don't bet this horse?"

If you are using the customized form guide in the R+S and,
Including A.P.I as a feature you may want to check again(Not 12 months)

I was using this years ago but due to so many errors went elsewhere.

Race 7 Cessnock A.P.I. as they should be,
The brackets are R+S if you included as on the customized worksheet.

1-1576 (1575)
2-1656 (1656)
3-1986 (1986)
4-1790 (1314)
5-1904 (1592)
6-1216 (1217)
7-2002 (1477)
8-1068 (1445)
9-2559 (1622)
10-1119 (1259)
11-987 (988)
12-1098 (872)
13-1610 (1084)
14-1065 (1134)

I remember ringing them years ago to tell them the problem,
Not sure if this would affect the Neurals if this is how they are sourced, Looks like they haven't got around to it yet.

This is just 1 race as it is (1 of 5) bettable races for me today,
I haven't checked anything else today.

Cheers.
Garyf.

Logic looks sound - an interesting angle, Lux.

Cheers LG

__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB

On R+S there are three average PM settings in the customized worksheet.

CarPM - Average career prizemoney per start
12mPM - Average prizemoney per start earnt in the last 12 months
API - $1000 of dollars won per start

Unless i'm reading them incorrectly the API one seems to be off the mark on most runners.

Cessnock Race 7
# - API - (Car$)
1 - 1.97 - (1575)
2 - 0.61 - (1656)
3 - 0.39 - (1986)
4 - 1.20 - (1314)
5 - SCR - (1592)
6 - 1.49 - (1217)
7 - 0.98 - (1477)
8 - 1.72 - (1446)
9 - SCR - (1622)
10 - 1.80 - (1259)
11 - 1.30 - (988)
12 - 1.54 - (872)
13 - 0.63 - (1084)
14 - 0.84 - (1134)