Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 6th September 2012, 08:26 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garyf
What's your opinion on this L.G? .

Any of the above one word answers,
Will do just fine.

Cheers.



Attractive !

LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 6th September 2012, 08:29 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vortech
You have to also remember the POT can be affected by the compound affect.

From the few of professional punters that made 100K last financial year, many of the bets were around $1.00 but with many many races each week with several bet types.


A fair sprinkle of multiples, long shots then?

LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 6th September 2012, 08:31 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garyf
What's your opinion on this L.G? .

Any of the above one word answers,
Will do just fine.

Cheers.


And your's, garyf?

LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 6th September 2012, 08:58 PM
garyf garyf is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 359
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Greystoke
And your's, garyf?

LG
Same as yours.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 6th September 2012, 09:30 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,227
Default

OK, so lets explore further...

What if:
1. bank gets split 50/50
2. only 2 bets for the year
3. selection takes 5-10 mins
4. expected return = 10%
5. opposite position to 'the crowd'

Any thoughts on this one?

Attractive
Boring
Impossible
Easy
Madness

?

Cheers LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 6th September 2012, 09:35 PM
The Ocho The Ocho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,031
Default

Silly.

2 bets a year. What if you don't get a winner for a few years or you miss that one bet in 6 months.

Silly.
__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.”

― Earl Nightingale
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 6th September 2012, 09:44 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ocho
Silly.

2 bets a year. What if you don't get a winner for a few years or you miss that one bet in 6 months.

Silly.


a. Assume automatic selection eg BOT
b. You always get a winner bc you are sitting opposite to 'the crowd'

LG

PS would have preferred "madness"
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 6th September 2012, 09:56 PM
The Ocho The Ocho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,031
Default

Madness, sheer madness. 2 bets a year? What's your name? Barny?

__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.”

― Earl Nightingale
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 6th September 2012, 09:57 PM
beton beton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 589
Default

Lets get some perspective here. There is approx 40 meetings here in Aus for thoroughbreds, each with average of 8 races. 320 races per week, 16,640 races per year. Lets say your system allowed you to bet on half the races and you got 10% POT. and you only bet $1 each bet. This would give you 8,320 bets for a $832 return. Depending on your strike rate you may get a run of outs of 40 for example. So you may actually only ever need $80 to start and run this system. A 10x return on investment every year for $1 bets.
I will take it.
Similarly if you had a system that had you betting 5 horses per race at $1 for a 10% POT. This would give you 83,200 bets per year for a $8320 return. Unlikely that this system would need $800 at risk but this is still a 10x return on investment. I will take it. In fact I would give the other one away for this one.
The stark reality is that you need volume and a small POT comes with volume, to make punting pay. Big POT systems usually have a small number of bets, so you need a greater stake or a number of big POT systems to make anything out of it. It is better to have a slice of a very big pie than
than to have half a slice of a very small pie. Mind you I would not mind having a whole small pie if I could be guaranteed it everytime I wanted one.
Beton
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 6th September 2012, 10:13 PM
The Ocho The Ocho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,031
Default

I'm hungry now.
__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.”

― Earl Nightingale
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:16 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655