|
|
To advertise on these forums, e-mail us. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
AFLOK guys, this is the formula for AFL starts/odds. You can use this formula to calculate the expected start from the odds on the favourite. It was quite different from the NRL formula, which looked more like a distribution. The AFL formula is kind of a modified exponential, with quite a bit of fudging from the line makers. I suspect the line is moved to try and maximize bookie profits, as it would be more subjective in a high-scoring game like AFL over NRL. It seems that in AFL the bookies are a LOT more liberal with the relationship between starts and odds than the NRL. For instance, odds of $1.66 can vary from a start of -9.5 to -13.5. There is about a 3 point either-side shift in the lower starts, and in some places a 6 point movement in the higher starts.
This will work from about 1.01 to 1.90. You might find it easier to copy this to a Excel SpreadSheet. Jake. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Well done Jakelee,but I'm a bit lost.
Is e,that epsilon Naperian log thing? And Ln,is that the log to the base e. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Hello Moeee,
e is the exponential function. Read boffin stuff here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_function Most calculators have one, and it's usually labled "Exp". In excel you use the function exp(...). Basically, it's just a special number that has an infinite number of decimal places, but lucky for us the calculator has a good approximation! So to do e^7, on the calculator you would do EXP -> 7. And yes, Ln is Log to the base of e. Also known as the natural log. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Jakelee.
How you showed an example of working out the start from odds,Can you do an example of a margin.Say if I thought a team would win by 15 points,could you do this example step by step to show the ODDS. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Like this:
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you Jakelee.
And if you played around with the values b and c,could it then work with the base ten? Don't understand how e came into it. Wasn't it supposed to be following a graph of tan? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|