If any bookmaker is dumb enough or lazy enough to simply use UNITAB figures and not cover these loopholes, then they get what they deserve.

Funny that this hasn't happened before, but I guess they'd only do it if they were pretty sure the dog was going to win.

How much did they actually pay out to win this money though? They bet $75000 on the other 5 runners and they would have got back about $65000 if any of them had won, but what about the winner? I didn't see anything about how much money they'd actually bet on the winner???