
21st April 2007, 10:10 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,145
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chuck
I might not think that K or tate or lyon should be there, but even those guys would absolutely dominate their counterparts Inu, Soiola and Vatuvei.
|
I'm not sure if you actually read my post, you would have seen that, although i think their were better candidates for the job, i never said these guys weren't going to perform, because of the low quality of their opposition. K might have done well - whats not to say Slater or bowen would have carved up NZ, seeing as they have been doing it to similar quality sides all year
you have proved nothing, Australia cantered home by 24 points and all the commentators could talk about was this "below par peformance" throughout the game. I said if the aussies tried hard enough they would win by 50 and that would seem correct after last night
to stop this thread spiralling hopelessly out of control, bviously we will just have to agree to disagree, personally, i think that if Nathan Hindmarsh thought that this game might jeopardise the Eel's chances on Sunday then there is no way he would risk injury - and you think he will just go in as hard as he can, for the absolute pride in the aussie jumper and the amazing honour of winning the Anzac test
|