|
|
|
This betting system wins!
Instantly check years of past results to create your own unique winning systems. Superb value database and software. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() What did I assume? I was just tracking the tipsters and based off the success of one of them yesterday thought, well maybe they might be good to follow.
So far the scoreboard is 2 good ones (MV + Scone) and 2 crap ones (Warnambool + Cranbourne). What have I blown exactly? I don't see what I've done wrong, I'm just speculating here based on the results I've seen so far. The problem that I've seen so far based on the results, is that even if you do get most of every race the Quinella odds are pretty pathetic. The true measure of a tipster (my opinion) is when they get the ones that pay some decent odds. So then they are not just simply picking the top 4 horses but actually making selections based on some other information I don't know about. Which is really the whole point, since I could just as easily select the top 4 rated horses. Matthew Hill seems alright so far but I've only tracked one of his races. I say this only because he had a selection that had the quinella end up paying $46. Last edited by pengo : 30th December 2007 at 04:44 PM. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|