|
|
To advertise on these forums, e-mail us. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I said you are entitled to your opinion, but I don't agree with it. But you said initially... Someone knew exactly what was going on. This was 1 lone sole with an awfully big gripe with an odds on horse that just happened to tail right off. And I disagree. There are plenty of punters that know how Canterbury treats it's favourites. and 50,000 is not a lot of money or liability when talking about $1.70 to $1.88. And the hot Waterhouse favourite was beaten in a previous race. You happened to see some money and a poorly performing horse. Your conclusion is hype driven, but you're allowed to have it. The reason of proof is because you are casting aspertions on the trainer and the jockey when it might be an innocent fumble. It's unfair no matter who it is.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software. Now with over 412,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races! http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html *RaceCensus now updated to 31/12/2024 Video overview of RaceCensus here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|