I question the value of so-called "exclusive" interviews with trainers and connections of the chances in upcoming races....do you?
Why would they tell the "mugs" who provide the betting turnover which allows many to "wallow" in luxury...all provided by the supposedly "illiterate" betting public? Why don't the commentators ask what the interviewee has wagered upon?
As I've said before, the definition of "mug" is:
Most
Unlikely
Gain
Accordingly, as I have recommended many times before...do your own form study and wager with a viable betting strategy....that's if you can "tear" yourself away from the Champagne Bar!
There is an arrogance displayed by some broadcasters which re-affirms their deluded perceptions that they are "the chosen few" who are entitled to "reap" the profits from the generally uninformed public who are treated as "cash-cows" for their extravagant lifestyle.
However, as they say "there is one born every minute....!"