Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 12th March 2011, 10:56 AM
wesmip1 wesmip1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,601
Default Debunking another myth....2000m+ favs

Here is just something quick.

Most people think the shorter the race the more chance plays a part in the result. But is this true as far as a profit stand point?

Because of this belief, people tend to back fav's in the 1600m+ races to a very short price because the fav should win more often as its got a longer run to show its class.

Looking at it quickly if you layed every fav at or under $3 in < 1600m races you end up losing 213 units. If you were to lay favs in 1800m+ events you get a profit of 3 units. Lay favs in 2000m+ events and you get a 14 unit profit.

Why ? My belief is pace affects these races more then anything else. If the fav does not get a pace that suits it then it is going to find trouble. And also because people think favs should get up due to their class over longer races the price is too short. Further to this we don't have a lot of races 2000m+ in this country and the form at this distance is usually justified by form at a shorter distance (1600m - 1800m).

I would like to hear others opinions on it.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:21 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655