That's a shame.
It gave punters the chance to have a hands on experience of a data base, that can be interrogative, to exploit a possible edge.

I goes back to my theory that you could post the most successful system ever, for free & still the majority will either ignore it or change it so that it does not perform, then say the system is no good.

I would have thought that he would have been inundated with new free members , but it also supports my other theory that punters generally don't like sharing any information that they deem valuable.

Even if it was valuable, the next punter is going to change the rules anyway. so that it is becomes different again anyway.

There was this system I posted on another site .
It was for targeting Horses with the warning that its not to be used on Dogs because it will fail.
Guess what? , a reader runs with the idea using real money, on the Dogs & not the Horses .then claimed the method does not work?
I asked why he chose to do that.
He claimed that he felt it should not make any difference , based on zero past data?
What can I say.

That's why I don't mind sharing any of our findings, because it will be changed anyway.
I guess you could call that a 1.01 surety tip that could be applied to the majority of punters.

__________________
Cheers.