I've observed that the more bets you have, the less POT you'll be able to achieve. Using ratings for example, and betting in most races, a POT less than 10% seems to be a great result. I have run systems through my database and have come up with quite a few different methods that show POT's well in excess of 50% but each system showing only one or two bets per month. Cumulatively speaking these systems add up to one or two bets per week. There's a lot of work for one or two bets per week, and Bhagwan has stated many times on this forum that the best systems seem to have only a few bets each moth.

So, the more bets you want, you'll end up with a skinny POT ..... the fewer bets the greater the POT.

I've recently come up with a system with a great POT that targets first up runners but only has 79 bets over 12 years. The S/R is in excess of 30% and the max div is $9.90 so the system has legs. BUT, who on here only wants to bet once or twice per month.

It reminds me of a rule in the Zurcih Axioms, which states you should only play for meaningful stakes.

Make of this post what you will ..... I'm sure I'll be criticised for not posting my systems.