Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 10th July 2002, 06:07 PM
becareful becareful is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Canberra
Posts: 730
Default

Well it looks like the "Curse of the Propun Forum" has hit Bert. Result for the day was very disappointing with a loss of $1150

For those who did not get the trial today I have listed all the selections below along with the bet amount as specified by the spreadsheet, dividend (UNITAB as this is the one that Bert quotes on his website) and running total. The rules of the system say only bet if selection is over $4.00 so I have listed the Unitab approximate for each selection - this price was taken from the Sky TV coverage (if under $10 on meetings with SKY) or from the Internet on early Belmont races or where price was over $10 (to get accurate price). The price was from as close to the jump as possible whilst still allowing time to bet on Unitab. The bet amount is taken from the spreadsheet (rounding up as per the rules) and my "target" for the day was a $5 profit (assuming a bank of $1000). If div approx was less than $4 at jump then no bet (but I have still listed the selections and any divs). Betting was win-only so I have not listed any place divs (weren't that many anyway).

















































































































































































































































































































Race



Sel($ )



Bet



Div



Total



SR1



3 ( 5.9)



2



0.0



-2



MR1



6 (18.1)



1



0.0



-3



BR1



1 ( 1.7)



0



1.7



-3



AR1



2 ( 1.3)



0



0.0



-3



SR2



6 (13.2)



1



0.0



-4



MR2



4 ( 3.7)



0



3.2



-4



BR2



2 ( 7.9)



2



0.0



-6



BR2



11 ( scr)
** ** **



AR2



2 ( 1.4)



0



0.0



-6



AR2



5 ( 6.9)



2



0.0



-8



SR3



8 (18.4)



1



0.0



-9



MR3



19 (14.5)



2



0.0



-11



BR3



1 ( 7.6)



3



0.0



-14



BR3



3 ( 6.7)



4



0.0



-18



AR3



2 ( 4.2)



8



0.0



-26



SR4



1 ( 4.4)



10



0.0



-36



MR4



No Selection
** ** **



BR4



2 ( 5.3)



10



0.0



-46



AR4



3 ( 4.0)



0



0.0



-46



AR4



5 ( 3.1)



0



0.0



-46



PR1



4 ( 6.6)



10



0.0



-56



SR5



5 (13.5)



5



0.0



-61



MR5



6*( 4.2)



21



0.0



-82



BR5



2 (15.8)



6



0.0



-88



AR5



5*( 4.7)



26



0.0



-114



PR2



11 ( scr)
** ** **



SR6



5 ( 8.1)



17



0.0



-131



MR6



2 ( scr)
** ** **



BR6



3*( scr)
** ** **



AR6



3 ( 5.2)



33



0.0



-164



PR3



1 ( 3.7)



0



4.2



-164



SR7



1 (24.8)



8



0.0



-172



MR7



2*(11.7)



17



0.0



-189



BR7



3 (12.4)



18



0.0



-207



AR7



1 ( 3.5)



0



0.0



-207



AR7



7 ( 6.7)



38



0.0



-245



PR4



1*( 3.5)



0



0.0



-245



PR4



4 ( 5.7)



54



0.0



-299



SR8



2*(10.4)



33



0.0



-332



SR8



4 ( 3.4)



0



3.5



-332



MR8



2*( 6.7)



60



0.0



-392



MR8



6 ( 3.9)



0



0.0



-392



BR8



1*( 2.5)



0



2.4



-392



AR8



3 ( 3.1)



0



2.9



-392



PR5



5 ( 4.5)



114



0.0



-506



PR6



2 ( 5.3)



119



0.0



-625



PR6



4 ( 4.5)



180



0.0



-805



PR7



4*( 5.5)



180



0.0



-985



PR8



2 ( 7.0)



165



0.0



-1150




* indicates a UBUTEE selection

As you can see the selections were pretty disappointing with only a few short-priced winners getting home (all ruled out by the $4 rule).

The only questionable call in the betting was with Belmont Race 3 - as there was no sky coverage of this race I was relying on the radio coverage and the internet odds to decide whether I would have placed a bet. At jump time the internet (UNITAB) was showing 3.70 so no bet under the rules of the system (it was slightly over $4 on NSW but as I was simulating betting with Unitab that did not apply).

I think this demonstrates the great danger in a "target" betting system (or a loss-chasing staking system) as the bet size and loss you make starts to escalate rapidly if you do have an extended run of outs like Bert had today.

Certainly on today's results the selections do not look like they are worth the price being charged and the system itself (ie. target betting) can easily be applied to your own selections if you really wanted to but I would only do it if your selections make a profit at level stakes. I think Bert has just been lucky to not hit a run like this previously (actually looking at his results he did have a wipeout on his grey/trots last month and there was also another day when the last bet of the day saved him from another big wipeout).



[ This Message was edited by: becareful on 2002-07-10 19:29 ]

[ This Message was edited by: becareful on 2002-07-10 19:30 ]

[ This Message was edited by: becareful on 2002-07-10 19:31 ]
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655