Just read all the posts with interest. I am in your camp Crash. As most of you will know by now I rate and price, basically Melbourne only because I know the horses, and knowing the horses is a big advantage, and something that only comes with watching them race time and time again. I have DEFINITELY found my best results to be 1400 - 2000. I probably have my best results 1400-1600 but I know that the 2000m at Flemington - for example - is a great 2000m to bet. I'm with you - I rarely do the sprints. The lower amount of action is more than compensated by the greater amount of profit.

I agree completely with the reasons you expounded for not doing those kinds of races, too. Those are the exact reasons I don't do them.

So, nice post. (Of course, I was always going to think it a nice post considering it agrees with everything I think...............!)

Duritz.