hi,
I've been lurking for a while getting used to the personalities and I was looking through all the previous posts and the arguments for and against all kinds of systems and staking plans. Usually when one mentions a system I grab the latest results and flick through to see how that system would have gone on what is a random day - today. And usually the answer is hopelessly.
, he says with all due respect:-)

And then I spotted Bhagwan's post about pairing the horses together, picking the best formed horse of the pair and voila you have lots of winners. To which many of you replied with contempt since its appears to have no merit or scientific basis.

Because I could never bring myself to bet on 4 horses in one race anyhow, I needed another qualifier so I added to Bhagwans theory.After picking the 4 horses I then took the one with the lowest advertised price.( I am assuming I have got this right)

As I spotted this yesterday I applied it to yesterdays results. Assuming I have the thrust of his theory correct I was amazed at the results.11 races qualified, there were 4 winners at 5.80,10.50,4.00 and 3.30 - a nice profit for 11 bets and 10 of the 11 ran a place paying between 1.20 and 3 for the place.

I havent looked any further back because I dont keep form, but it was interesting to note because - as I said - when people mention any system I have a quick look and they are usually very unprofitable.

People mention ratings - I look, hopeless unless you are going to spend forever filtering the results out.
People mention all kinds of online websites ranging from the neurals at racing and sports to free picks.

Never had success with any of them.

But Bhagwans little number system romped in.

Maybe it was a lucky day with 4 tracks conducive to favourites coming in - but I will be keeping a lookout on this little method.

interesting...

see ya