My research tells me ,that one will strike more winners chasing a conscences panel of tipsters rather than a single tipster.
e.g. Weekend Ausralian , Herald ect.
The Wizard racing paper has a 36% SR from its top 2 conscences panel of computer generated selections. Big difference in SR, similar average div.
They can have days where they strike short prices when they win but they also have prices that get up at suprisingly higher than expected.

Individual tipsters have an average SR of 35%
Therefore ,expect a longer run of outs, their prices can be stronger ,but it depends on the day if the the Favs want to get up all day or not.

If one is good at separating the 2 horses out of the top 2 selections for a result , one should have a million dollars by Xmas.
With a 45% strike rate from the top 2 , the people advocating that this is not the way to go & that there are better ways of doing this ,should have no problem sorting the strongest selection from the said top 2 & only backing them if they are satisfied with the price on offer. Otherwise let the race go.

The fact remains , that the top 2 have a 45% SR , so build on that.


Idea No.1
Target the top 2 in most Fav column in the Weekend Ausralian.
Target races 1400M+
Bet the one with the worst weight rating (100Pters) as per TABQ or Wizard form guide.ect.
What we are trying to do here ,is chase the value runner of the 2.
Its amazing how many winners this produces & some at very good prices.


I would like so see if there are punters out there who would like to share some different ideas, on how they like to use them.

__________________
Cheers.