![Old](images/statusicon/post_old.gif)
11th June 2005, 12:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 130
|
|
Zorro. Hi again! You may have seen/heard #3 just winning race 3 in Adelaide. This was only at about $13,after being over $22 a few minutes earlier. At either price, the odds were underestimating both the horse AND the trainer (K.Sweeney). Since he (Sweeney) already had the FAVOURITE (#1) in this race, why would he (or ANYONE) add another, much longer priced, conveyance to the mix?? By my reading this kind of move should be more "respected" than theoretical notions of "class" or the like. Let the trainer's moves be your guide to the horse's ability!!! Cheers once more
P.S. just as I'm signing off #17 has got 3rd in B4 at around $23 the PLACE. This is another classic. I'm on him (but only to win,alas) as a you'd have to wonder what the MUSWELLBROOK trainer saw that prompted the trip to Brisbane. This is the same trainer who won the Grand Prix last week (at 40s) with Spuruson. Yet another one who SHOULDN'T have been "in it" on the "class ratings"!!!!
Last edited by punter57 : 11th June 2005 at 01:11 PM.
|