6th November 2005, 11:12 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 479
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by crash
Someone wins tatslotto every day, but from an individual basis [which was obviously my point], some 'bets' are in unbeatable races due to depth and poor odds.
Tattslotto is an example of a 'race' [admittedly of a different kind] with extreme depth that for [almost] all of us, will remain an unbeatable race.
Everyone has their unbeatable races.
Naturally I expect BJ and Dale to be in front in all of the above races [with 1st. devision Tattslotto wins too] :-)
|
Tattslotto has nothing to do with what we are talking about. Yes some people end up in front by playing tattslotto, but it is and always will be unbeatable. It is a random number generator that pays out 65% of what is put in. To compare is ludicrous.
Yes everybody has their unbeatable races. The ones they lose on. Nobody has a 100% strike rate. But to suggest that you should steer clear of a certain type of race is wrong. Every race is a different event. The Melbourne Cup of next year has nothing at all to do with this one that has just been run. It will have different horses running, all with different form lines.
There is value to be found in every race. Just because you can't find it, doesn't mean that nobody can.
I ask you this. If you had have laid every horse that you had backed in the Melbourne cup over the last 35 years, would you be in front? Either you answer yes, meaning that they are indeed beatable, or no, meaning that by backing them you would have won. Either way, you would have won on an "unbeatable" race.
How could this be possible?
|
Threaded Mode