Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > General Topics
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 8th November 2014, 08:54 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default What if.. ?

What if the world was really upside down - inside out - back the front.

E.G The last 3 runs

What if most of us are reading it backwards?

Cheers LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 9th November 2014, 10:14 AM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,332
Smile

Yeah.
Most punters rely on the last run without ever considering what Class of race it was .
i.e up in class , drop in class, same class.

Is that what you were referring to?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 9th November 2014, 10:32 AM
Rinconpaul Rinconpaul is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 755
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Greystoke
What if the world was really upside down - inside out - back the front.

E.G The last 3 runs

What if most of us are reading it backwards?

Cheers LG


I think what LG is referring to is something like Held Hostage's form?
1 2 5 due for a win again? and did at $7.80
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  Held hostage.JPG
Views: 564
Size:  11.9 KB  
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 9th November 2014, 10:42 AM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinconpaul
I think what LG is referring to is something like Held Hostage's form?
1 2 5 due for a win again? and did at $7.80


Jeepers. You know me better than I do RP! Any thoughts on this one gentlemen??

Cheers LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 9th November 2014, 10:49 AM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,332
Default

Rinconpaul

Might be but how would one know without considering ALL the form factors that produce winners.
i.e Class /weight etc etc
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 9th November 2014, 10:56 AM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default

Was thinking more on these angles Darky...

1. The horse is in the race because the trainer thinks it has some chance of winning. Regardless of current form

2. It has been successful before based on its earlier form

3. We get better value given its best form is not its most recent

LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 9th November 2014, 11:14 AM
Rinconpaul Rinconpaul is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 755
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkydog2002
Rinconpaul

Might be but how would one know without considering ALL the form factors that produce winners.
i.e Class /weight etc etc


Well considering that assessing horses based on recent form only produces 1 in 3 winners, then LG's contrarian approach is as good as any, in my book
Looking at Flemington yesterday the winners L3s were:
1
125
699
x11
532
115
x11
N31
x13

Just an observation, but I'd be dropping that one LG in favour of: Had a win in last three starts? 7 out of 9
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 9th November 2014, 11:49 AM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinconpaul
Well considering that assessing horses based on recent form only produces 1 in 3 winners, then LG's contrarian approach is as good as any, in my book
Looking at Flemington yesterday the winners L3s were:
1 (1) 16.10
125 (4) 7.80
699 (3) 10.60
x11 (11) 3.10
532 (5) 5.50
115 (8) 9.70
x11 (5) 9.50
N31 (5) 7.00
x13 (4) 4.40

Just an observation, but I'd be dropping that one LG in favour of: Had a win in last three starts? 7 out of 9


Food for thought RP. Have listed the no. of selections in each race with a win in last 3 starts and the div on unitab as a guide.

Cheers LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 9th November 2014, 11:52 AM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,332
Smile

Hi Rincon ,
Perhaps you would run that through your R2W data base.
I,m interested in the outcome

Cheers and thanks
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 9th November 2014, 12:05 PM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,332
Smile

LG,
Is your thinking along the lines of excluding LS winners but including 3rd and 2nd runs in current campaign.

I love this sort of intellectual challenge.

Thanks for posting.

ps I will look along the lines of price ranges i.e $2 - $11 but today ALL price ranges.

Good luck with it.

Last edited by darkydog2002 : 9th November 2014 at 12:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:20 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655