Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #151  
Old 31st August 2006, 11:45 AM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by crash
A bit more mis -direction there chrome [implying because they were losing]?
You know very well why I stopped my thread 'off crash's cuff' and so does everyone else. And by the way, if you check the closing figures the POT was just over 20% [flat stakes] for a lot of 'real' bets posted in advance.

Anyway, this thread has been great fun [a soap opera?]. All of my posts generally and to anyone in particular have been tongue in cheek [and gee em up] comments. The thread has been a breath of fresh air for this punter at least.
Cheers.


You take the cake Chrome. You quote the first part of the above post and tell me to lighten up? You obviously never bothered to read the second half. Or then again maybe you did but wanted to carry on with a bit of mischief :-))
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 31st August 2006, 11:53 AM
Stix Stix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,013
Default

Anyone rembember the kids show with the hand puppet Lambchops??

They have a song in it that goes.....

"This is a song that never ends,
It goes on and on my friend,
Some people started singing it not knowing what it was,
And they'll continue singing it forever, just be-cause......

This is a song that never ends,
It goes on and on my friend,
Some people started singing it not knowing what it was,
And they'll continue singing it forever, just be-cause......

This is a song that never ends.................."
__________________
Stix
.......Giddy Up..... !!
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 31st August 2006, 12:07 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crash
You take the cake Chrome. You quote the first part of the above post and tell me to lighten up? You obviously never bothered to read the second half. Or then again maybe you did but wanted to carry on with a bit of mischief :-))


And that's exactly why I edited my post, because I just knew you'd take it the wrong way again.

I give up
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 402,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/05/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 31st August 2006, 12:59 PM
Tubby Tubby is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 152
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stix
They have a song in it that goes.....

"This is a song that never ends,
It goes on and on my friend,
Some people started singing it not knowing what it was,
And they'll continue singing it forever, just be-cause......

This is a song that never ends,
It goes on and on my friend,
Some people started singing it not knowing what it was,
And they'll continue singing it forever, just be-cause......

This is a song that never ends.................."
That made me laugh. Thanks Stix
__________________
Ever get the feeling that the world is a tuxedo and you are a pair of brown shoes?
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 31st August 2006, 01:25 PM
mv2040 mv2040 is offline
Suspended. Invalid e-mail address.
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 72
Default

Would some please be so kind as to give us forumites the holy grail so this thread can finally be put to bed

Were not all going to agree......
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 31st August 2006, 06:47 PM
Shaun Shaun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 3,456
Default

Hey Mark...sounds like the same problem Stuart had to a lesser degree.

I will have to send you some of my ideas you may be able to come up with the answers i am missing, it involves using two different bet types and hedging them against each other for a positive outcome.
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 1st September 2006, 05:35 PM
DR RON DR RON is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: victoria
Posts: 562
Wink

To those who have doubts about Marks statements, I have seen evidence of what he does and how he makes a profit, in some emails he sent me when he was helping me out with questions about betfair. His profit on turnover isnt big but it is no risk. Also if the eayrun is still with us please continue to post your thoughts. At least wait till he's posted everything before knocking him.
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 2nd September 2006, 11:18 AM
Moderator 3 Moderator 3 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 217
Default

Please note:

Posters are entitled to ask whether a betting method stacks up mathematically. People are entitled to disagree with a post and substantiate their position.

An inability to understand the maths of racing and handicapping, or a lack of interest in that area is fair enough.

But that does not give a poster the right here to accuse others who believe maths is important for understanding racing and handicapping of making a "personal slanging match" because they raise these issues. Nor is name calling acceptable.

Moderator.
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 2nd September 2006, 02:16 PM
Moderator 3 Moderator 3 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 217
Default

By registering to use the OZmium Forums users agree to abide by the following Terms of Use.

Please note that the Forums are a free service extended by a commercial entity and are not public property. The Forum Terms of Use take precedence over freedom of expression, in the interests of maintaining this service.

People who register for the Forums may receive occasional promotional material via e-mail from OZmium Pty Ltd. This will be minimal and your e-mail address will not be passed on to any third party under any circumstances.

The OZmium Forums are minimally moderated. Postings are not checked before publication, but if any are detected that run contrary to the Terms of Use outlined here they may be edited or deleted. In extreme cases, where a breach of the law may have occurred, the appropriate authorities will be alerted.

When registering to post on the Forums please choose an appropriate user name. Obscene or overly suggestive names are not permitted. Names that double as a commercial promotion by containing the name of a site or a hyperlink are not allowed without prior permission of the Forum owners. The use of famous names as pseudonyms in cases where some readers could reasonably be expected to think that it really might be that person are not allowed. (Example: It is okay to call yourself Napoleon, but not okay to call yourself Bart Cummings, unless you are!)

Opinions and advice offered on the Forums should be treated with due caution and the owners of this site do not accept responsibility for any loss arising from it. Any opinions expressed here belong to the poster and are not endorsed by the Forum owners unless explicitly stated.

Management reserves the right to use the Forums in any way it sees fit, including the posting of commercial material.

All postings to the Forums and their subsequent threads become the property of the Forum owners. Requests for the removal of postings and their threads for reasons other than factual error, potentially defamatory content, or occasional special circumstances will in most cases not be granted.

The following types of postings are not acceptable.

Potentially defamatory or libelous.
This especially relates to the identifying of businesses, racing products, racing personalities or other individuals in a context that could harm reputations, even if justified.


Offensive language or sexual content.

Personal abuse or unpleasantness.
A member who continually alienates other members of the Forum may be restricted or banned.


Incitement of racial hatred or other activities illegal under Australian law.

Promotion of other sites in a way that might be expected to result in financial disadvantage to OZmium Pty Ltd.
For advice on what is acceptable in this regard before posting, please contact OZmium management.


Promotion of 'get rich quick' schemes or e-mail solicitations to join such schemes.

Unpaid advertisements or spam.

Persistent irrelevant or off-topic postings such as political or religious rhetoric.

Persistent attacks on OZmium Pty Ltd designed to cause commercial harm.
In particular, attacks from anonymous posters concealing their identities behind generic (Yahoo, Hotmail, etc) e-mail addresses are not acceptable in view of the likelihood of them being competitors.


Postings not covered by any of the above, but deemed clearly inappropriate by management.

NOTE:
Management reserves the right to responsibly edit postings in line with the Terms of Use outlined above, for example to remove an obscene reference from an otherwise worthwhile posting, without justification or entering into correspondence.


Management also reserves the right to restrict or ban members who contravene these Terms of Use, create a nuisance or become difficult or vexatious, without justification or entering into correspondence.
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 4th September 2006, 06:50 PM
jfc jfc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 402
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moderator 3
Please note:

Posters are entitled to ask whether a betting method stacks up mathematically. People are entitled to disagree with a post and substantiate their position.

An inability to understand the maths of racing and handicapping, or a lack of interest in that area is fair enough.

But that does not give a poster the right here to accuse others who believe maths is important for understanding racing and handicapping of making a "personal slanging match" because they raise these issues. Nor is name calling acceptable.

Moderator.



Once more I've trawled through this thread before presenting my considered contribution.

One clear offender throughout this is Chrome Prince. But rather than this regular being cautioned for his violation of the T&C he continues unhampered. Meanwhile some of those rightly challenging him have mysteriously vanished.

On repeated occasions he presented such edicts:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrome Prince

To make $50,000 per year on a $4,000 bank is impossible - fact.

...

The bank would never withstand it - mathematical fact.

...

I don't buy it - sorry.

...

- it doesn't add up.

.....

If you do the math properly it's obvious that he is the one ridiculing us




All this before TheEasyRun had an opportunity to mention what "it" actually was.

Where was the substantiation?

And when first Sahasastar, then I, presented alternate valid mathematical demonstrations how it can be done, he made no effort to learn from that and mend his ways.

There is no point in repeating the T&C when certain regulars are permitted to flaunt their disregard for them or any common decencies.
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:23 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655