Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 8th August 2005, 04:14 PM
Desi Desi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 502
Smile

Thank you all for the interesting and informative posts on this topic...Hawkeye, you mention value (which I hear a lot from other forum members) and I note that some members give selections but only on the proviso that the horse is paying a certain divvie and not to go below this...

I know that this has been asked before and excuse my ignorance...can I ask how do you determine what that minimum value should be (FYI, I have a rating system that Ive been working on) and if a horse wins then (as an objective viewer) would that not be considered good enough?....always hard to pick winners as it is...if one doubles one's $$$ is that an acceptable return?
And finally, if you mention win bets only on the TAB...is it safer to back each way and know that there is some return if your pick just misses out or does your experience suggest that there is a greater return in the long run?

Again thanks all for your contributions and have to say that I have a been on an accelerated learning curve these last 6 months...great stuff!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14th August 2005, 11:45 PM
hawkeye hawkeye is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Desi
Thank you all for the interesting and informative posts on this topic...Hawkeye, you mention value (which I hear a lot from other forum members) and I note that some members give selections but only on the proviso that the horse is paying a certain divvie and not to go below this...

I know that this has been asked before and excuse my ignorance...can I ask how do you determine what that minimum value should be (FYI, I have a rating system that Ive been working on) and if a horse wins then (as an objective viewer) would that not be considered good enough?....always hard to pick winners as it is...if one doubles one's $$$ is that an acceptable return?
And finally, if you mention win bets only on the TAB...is it safer to back each way and know that there is some return if your pick just misses out or does your experience suggest that there is a greater return in the long run?

Again thanks all for your contributions and have to say that I have a been on a
n accelerated learning curve these last 6 months...great stuff!!
win only on the tab can give some great returns but when betting each way i suggest the bookies they return 1/4 ODDS THE PLACE WHEN 8 OR MORE STARTERS TAB NOT AS CONSISTENT EG.$9.00 WIN 8/1 and $2.10 PLACE10/9 bookies $9.00 WIN 8/1 and$3.00 PLACE 2/1 it doesnt sound like much but we back more plce getters than winners so overall better off thats if you can get to the track to compare odds good punting all.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19th October 2006, 11:23 PM
AdriamnT AdriamnT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 320
Default

The only time I take 'tipster' input into my calcs is when they tip something way outside my ratings. I usually collect much more than I would normally expect
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31st December 2006, 03:48 PM
xanadu xanadu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 1,492
Thumbs down

Does anyone listen to the Saturday morning racing programs-whatever state that may be?
If you do then you would be going broke at an accelarating rate.
Some of these "tipsters".....well , what can I say.... their strike-rate would suggest that they may have to "get a real job!"
Why don't they get "fair dinkum" and tip the horses they feel have a real chance!
Any other sceptical punters out there....if so....please give us your views.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20th January 2007, 03:37 PM
xanadu xanadu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 1,492
Wink

Well, the "Saturday crowd" as I personally describe these "tipsters" again failed to deliver. Their "specials" failed to salute the judge and one of their "lays" duly saluted, so, if they actually backed their own recommendations they would be broke in a very short space of time.....then again there is "arbitrage" isn't there?
Moral Of Story: Punters, please have faith in your own selections and support them accordingly........you will get better value!
On another note: I monitored a review program once and the panelist admitted that he rarely bets....well, what can I say.....it's like buying a motor vehicle from a used car dealer who had never driven a car!

Cheers

Last edited by xanadu : 20th January 2007 at 03:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 9th November 2008, 01:40 PM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,330
Smile

Here,s a system ( never been proven though )

Put a line through every tipsters selections and bet the rest .

i.e If there were 8 horses not tipped anywhere add 1 and Only bet those at $9.00 Plus.

Cheers.
darky.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15th November 2008, 04:39 PM
xanadu xanadu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 1,492
Talking

Fair dinkum.....!
Some of these "so-called egg-sperts" really need to have a good hard look at themselves!
A trained monkey could do better than some of them!
In fact an experiment was conducted and screened on Discovery Channel when a "monkey"(chimpanzee) randomly selected horses by pressing a buzzer for the runners which appealed to it.
Guess what.....it had a better record than more than half of the "turf egg-sperts" who actually are being paid for their so-called skills.
Makes you/me wonder doesn't it?

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26th November 2008, 12:58 PM
xanadu xanadu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 1,492
Talking

What about when some of these so-called "egg-sperts" recommend "horses to follow?"
I know that some of them have been following the horses for years.....usually with a bucket and spade.......!!!
Some of their strike-rate is abysmal!

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 8th August 2005, 04:28 PM
Desi Desi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 502
Question

Sorry, me again...Hawkeye, you briefly mentioned bet types and methods...I have had difficulty maximising the $$ benefit of my selections and find that at the end of long day that I end up slightly ahead or even or worse, way down...it seems that knowing when and what and how to bet has a major impact on one's $$$ (at the end of the punting day)...

I have found more success betting on smaller fields although good returns and value can be found in the larger ones and tend to avoid exotics as I agree (with you) that you need a lot of $$$ to be successful...however I have seen a few Quinellas (exactas also) go by but dont know how one bets on these to get maximum benefit...any thoughts please that might point me in the right direction?
__________________
Why waste money on education when you can gamble it away on the horses? Its more fun when youre doing it and you learn quickly...esp when you lose...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 8th August 2005, 04:53 PM
Mr ed Mr ed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: melbourne
Posts: 721
Default

Desi,

Win betting, in my opinion is overall the best option. unless your horse is double figures, then e/w or straight out place is acceptable. This is due to the greatly superior odds one can attain for win betting to the supposedly proposed 1/4 odds available the place, this is very rarely the case. e.g paying $3.00 win $1.30 the place. Value is extremely hard to evaluate, if you can do it, your a pro. But i feel you don't have to be an expert to bet smart. If you looks at enough races, betting changes etc, you'll start to get a grasp of roughly how much your horse should be paying.

I have not yet fully ventured into Multiple betting yet, but am keen to. I do video form, and analyse (ussually) every horse in the race, i feel my knowledge of a particular race could be used more productively using trifectas, exactas etc. As Mav and Hawkeye have stated, you can't be stinngy and leave viable selections out because they cost to much.
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:04 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655