|
|
To advertise on these forums, e-mail us. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
I am just putting my intestines back in after I split my sides laughing at that one
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
what about blocking posts of ppl that go completely off topic :P
jk, but seriously what do you guys think of what these fellas did?? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Pretty clever indeed... One of the blokes who got stung is not a happy chappy, and is looking at a way out (how unusual for a book) .. But if they are gunna offer Best Tote or Unitab odds, they do that to attract business.. so stiff, they were outsmarted by a group of legends.. and must pay IMHO By offering best tote, it really says how pathetic the books are in general.. they are betting huge % (those not offereing best tote) whilst others have to offer 116% books to get business.. pretty ordinary, they obvioulsy dont have any blood in their veins... I have taken ALL my business away from the books and am using the tote and Betfair... and am much happier about it... Why did I move away from the books... one reason... that whinger in the territory, who failed to do his form about 12 months ago and got stung in Brisbane and then screamed the house down because he was left with a big liability on the race.. In the end there was nothing ever proved that was untoward about THAT RACE, but that did it for me... and some of these rogues, turn you off if you are even remotely successful and take a few bob from em... I choose to put my turnover elsewhere, and whinging about being stung on a dog race, does not do them any favours with me.. I won't be going back Moderator how about allowing the actual name of the animal this part of your site is about to actually appear on the screen *shakes head* Last edited by xptdriver : 21st December 2005 at 04:30 PM. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
The way I see it, if they only won $200,000, they must have only bet about $22,000 on the favourite. If this dog didn't win, presumably they would have received odds of about $6.5 so their liability for the race was no more than $25,000.
Whilst they still could have lost out plenty, essentially they backed a $1.30 dog at odds of $8. Certainly one way to get value. If it is not there, make it you***lf. So on this subject, is there anybody that offers best tote on the dog races? If there is, I doubt they will be in business for long. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Well, at the moment, believe it or not, r s e is being censored. How dumb is that on a h o r s e racing forum???
Moderators, can you fix that up please, because it's going to make things pretty difficult around here if we can't use the word h o r s e. horse Last edited by Moderator 4 : 22nd December 2005 at 08:57 AM. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
This is no sting, this is smart investing. The bookies are running a business, they should have this covered from all angles. They got it wrong, not the punters, and should have bet back on the tote after noticing strange TAB fluctuations (inflated pools). There is no reason for further investigation, the bookies are crying foul....what about the punters who have to cop books of 140% plus on a regular basis. Wear it fellas, you got some payback!
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software. Now with over 412,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races! http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html *RaceCensus now updated to 31/12/2024 Video overview of RaceCensus here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
I agree they found a loophole and used it....nothing wrong with that.....where in the rules does it say you can not back the whole field with different bet sizes.....it is up to the bookies to see what can and did happen....i bet it won't happen again.....i wonder if it was the same crew that did the sting with the place betting a few years back....that was also on the Qtab on the dogs.....i say good on them.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
If any bookmaker is dumb enough or lazy enough to simply use UNITAB figures and not cover these loopholes, then they get what they deserve.
Funny that this hasn't happened before, but I guess they'd only do it if they were pretty sure the dog was going to win. How much did they actually pay out to win this money though? They bet $75000 on the other 5 runners and they would have got back about $65000 if any of them had won, but what about the winner? I didn't see anything about how much money they'd actually bet on the winner??? Last edited by Sportz : 22nd December 2005 at 06:25 AM. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Brilliant is that not what punting is all about, beat the bookie or the tote. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"These things happen, good luck to them. We know who the punters are and if they do it again we will simply bet back on the dog on their tote with their own money, thus losing nothing. By the look of things they had about $25,000 with bookies around Australia."
Besides Seal, the other bookmakers are estimated to have paid out between $10,000 to $30,000 each – Seal won't reveal his loss." they are estimating they had $25000 on the dog itself but seal wont reveal his loss so it may be a bit more. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|