Originally Posted by Duritz

lol - i used to try to justify that approach when I was younger and my parents would tell me more than 3 drinks was binge drinking. "But I don't drink during the week," I'd say, "so I can have 21 on Sat night!"

Seriously though that article outlines what I was saying in all the other threads we're currently in here - bet 1% increasing/reducing. Take my example as a case in point, I have what looks to be an excellent system, yet it had a shocking run in june/july 04, and had you punted it non -reducing you'd be gone.

I've learnt a HEAP in the last 4 days since talking about all this stuff, and feel confident now that I've researched and seen this peaks and spikes and seen first hand from actual selections just how volatile this system business can be. I feel absolutely certain that non-reducing is the way to destroy your bank, and that 1% is plenty enough outlay.

That's just my opinion, formulated only just in the last few days so it's merely a fledgling opinion.

Originally Posted by jacfin

And it's a guaranteed way to have the smallest bet in every series on a winner. Seems a strange way to go about it