|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Watch for the post-race results! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who's ratings?????
Good luck if it's working for you,but I find it a bit harsh(actually,downright rude)that you suggest there is nobody on here with any commonsense.Maybe if you explained a bit more clearly than just ratings,ratings and $15 winners someone (like me) with no commonsense might understand more clearly. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I will explain exactly what cinna is talking about it seams more people are interested in bashing them instead of adding to the thread, no wonder this forum has gone down the crapper.
Ratings Races are these new races that the tab has decided to to give us you will see them listed as (RB78 C, RB78 C ,RB62 N ,) these are the three races they have today. CESSNOCK RACE 2 (RB78 C) WANGARATTA RACE 2 (RB78 C) WANGARATTA RACE 2 (RB62 N) Now what cinna is saying is that these types of races are producing some longer priced winners, i would think this may be a short lived situation until everyone gets a handle on the class factor of the horses running in these races and is able to work it in to there form study. If the opportunity is there take it while it lasts, i hope this explains it a little better. As for making rules up as they go thats about all you could do in this case as it is a new way of making money everyone has to find what works and exploit it. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Shaun
Thanks. The Ratings Based Programming races. Now I understand. I wonder if the phenomenom Cinna has exposed is more a function of the quality of runners going around this time of year than anything else. Pix |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don't see how as you claim in your previous post you backed the winner of: r3 NARROMINE CLOSING ODDS [STAB] 1 SYSTEMATIC (3) F WATTS 6.00 2nd 2 MUHAYAA'S IMAGE (5) J GALEA 55.60 3 STITCHEM (4) C LUNDHOLM 6.60 4 HELGAFELL (2) K NESTOR 5.60 5 DESERT FAIRY (6) M A CAHILL 8.50 win 6 BLACK ORCHID (1) G RYAN 1.90 3rd 7 KEN'S PICK (7) GLEN C DAVIS 26.90 Yes the winner [a photo] was ridden by a good jock last start, but in a maiden so it deserved the odds it won at, but they weren't $15 + as your original rules above at the start of this thread suggest. In fact you ruled out the only runners over $15. You seem to be making up the rules as you go to suit your post-race results [?] |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|