Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 2nd March 2007, 03:12 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,437
Default

crash,

i realise what you are getting at, and you're probably right, but someone prepared to lay an odds on horse at $3.00 is not smart when it goes on every single day in most races.
Of course there will be those that are layed, for one reason or another at higher prices, but not as an overall scenario, those layers have to be losing a lot of money and it bars anyone else out of the lay market if they want to make a profit.
I have a feeling rather than "not smart", the markets are miniscule by comparison and punters are "chasing" to get matched at their own expense, which is the number one golden rule of what not to do.

That's why I switched my method in Australia.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 426,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/10/2025
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg

Last edited by Chrome Prince : 2nd March 2007 at 03:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 2nd March 2007, 03:29 PM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Cool

Considering Betfair is still new here and with new punters joining every day, it will take a while for things to settle down. I doubt Poms being smarter [they wish] than Ozzie's has anything to do with it. They are just more familiar with Betfair and Laying, that's all.

They can't play cricket [they have been at it longer than we have] and are equally hopeless at most other international sports. I doubt they are especially good at punting either!

Last edited by crash : 2nd March 2007 at 03:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 2nd March 2007, 04:27 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crash
Considering Betfair is still new here and with new punters joining every day, it will take a while for things to settle down. They are just more familiar with Betfair and Laying, that's all.


Yes, that seems to be also part of it.

My pricing method breaks even at level stakes.

Here's some examples today:

Canterbury R5 Subtle Glance
I priced this horse at $2.60.
I backed it at $2.84 and won

Canterbury R6 Slow Waltz
I priced this horse at $2.10
I layed it at $1.94 and won

Sandown R4 Illustration
I priced this horse at Even money
I layed it at $1.80 and won

Canterbury R7 Quizzical Lady
I priced this horse at $2.50
I backed it at $2.80 and won

These sorts of over and under percentages just aren't available in the bigger markets.
Someone's going broke.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 426,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/10/2025
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 2nd March 2007, 05:36 PM
odericko
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

maybe early days yet michael but i think were onto a good loser here...another outstanding day
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 2nd March 2007, 06:43 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,789
Wink

I haven't looked too closely at it today because I don't have too much confidence in the neurals. Even the TA category can sometimes seem skewered. A top trainer can have a horse running at a certain track and because he never had a horse previously there the neurals can give him minimum points. I think the strike rate as Maria takes into account, would be more of an indicator.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 3rd March 2007, 08:26 AM
Racer Racer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crash
I doubt Poms being smarter

That's probably a fair statement Crash, assuming your survey only included the **** boxers, LOL ! LOL !

Kind Regards.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655