|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() hi,
i have used DS's base ratings and tweaked it a bit to get my own figures, i was just wondering if anybody could help me convert them to % chances & then $ figures for me to bet off? they turned out as such Armidale R7 4.-43.75 5.-41.5 2.-39 3.-38.5 6.-38 9.-36.5 11.-34.5 1.-32.5 12.-32.5 7.-30.75 10.-26 8-14 ps. they are all above zerio the - isnt minus. any help appreciated, Big M. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() note, 2 is scratched
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Big M, you can obtain a dollar-price for every horse in the race as per your ratings by going to the neural page for Armidale Race 7.
1 ) Change all 12 categories to zero. 2 ) Leave the PR category at 3 (or your preference) and change the Market % to 100 (or your preference) 3 ) Click Submit Change. 4 ) Input your ratings into the HCP column and then click Submit. I've done it using your ratings, and no.4 which is your top rater is priced at $5.00. Your lowest rated which is no.8 is priced at $71. These prices have taken into account the scratching of no.2. Last edited by michaelg : 4th May 2007 at 12:27 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ahhhh ofcourse! thanks michael!!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Michael,
not sure how you came up with those figures,i came up with 1- $201.00 ffice ![]() 3- $16.00 4- $1.80 5- $3.60 6- $21.00 7- $201.00 8- $201.00 9- $41.00 10- $201.00 11- $201.00 12- $201.00 Market%:100 currently Ias fixed odds i 2 horses are "overs" $55 on 4 @ $3.20 $27 on 5 @ $4 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Big M.
I've checked my figures again and come to the same prices. Changing PR from a setting of 3 to 5 has no.4 at $2.90. Did you adjust your ratings for the scratching of no.2 - I simply deleted it and applied your original ratings. No 4 has only 2.25 more points than your second-selection yet it is odds-on? Using PR at a setting of 5 has the winner at $6 - it paid slightly in excess on Unitab. When the new updates were introduced a few months ago I was getting conflicting information/ratings when using Firefox and Internet Explorer. I informed the webmaster who said it would be rectified. Maybe there is still a problem? Last edited by michaelg : 4th May 2007 at 04:54 PM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|