Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 30th March 2008, 10:56 AM
Shaun Shaun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 3,403
Default

This may sound a bit stupid but what is the best way to work out profit and loss with lay bets so i can work out profit on turnover
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 30th March 2008, 04:13 PM
jfc jfc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 402
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun
This may sound a bit stupid but what is the best way to work out profit and loss with lay bets so i can work out profit on turnover


Your turnover is really your risk.

So if you Lay a 20/1 (=21.0) chance for $1 - your risk and turnover are $20.

If you lay more than 1 contingency in a market (in proportion) your risk and turnover would start decreasing.

Lay and Back and it gets even weirder.

I don't know anyone who bother calculating POT for such complex scenarios.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 30th March 2008, 04:38 PM
YoungBuck YoungBuck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 436
Default

I thought that too, but someone on another forum who was very persuasive in their arguement suggests your turnover is simply what bets you are holding as the bookmaker, not your potential risk.

So your example JFC would indicate $1 turnover only.
__________________
All generalizations are dangerous.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 30th March 2008, 04:45 PM
Crackone Crackone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun
This may sound a bit stupid but what is the best way to work out profit and loss with lay bets so i can work out profit on turnover
The easiest way would be winnings div. by payout
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 30th March 2008, 05:18 PM
AngryPixie AngryPixie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YoungBuck
I thought that too, but someone on another forum who was very persuasive in their arguement suggests your turnover is simply what bets you are holding as the bookmaker, not your potential risk.

So your example JFC would indicate $1 turnover only.
Yes I didn't agree with that when I read it. JFC's right. It's the profit over and above your total liability that really should be used not your hold. I do record "Profit on Total Liability" for my own use but 3.5% doesn't sound as good as 23.4% "Profit on Total Hold"
__________________
Pixie
"It's worth remembering that profit isn't profit until it's spent off the racecourse." -- Crash

Last edited by AngryPixie : 30th March 2008 at 05:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:09 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655