#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I agree with you there Imagele. Far too many horses running around in circles going nowhere in life. Far too many meetings and even maidens in group races. So things are obviously a bit sick. Driving all this is a massive breeding industry making money hand over fist from mug owners who want to 'own a racehorse' for all the wrong reasons. Most owners or part owners, bleed money, not win it. Some fall in love with their horse and have the money to keep the chaff bandit going for years, not caring if it ever wins another race. Syndicate buying should be exposed for what it is. Example: $5k a 20th. share and $100 a month fees [trainers love that one]. What these share holders won't be told is the original sales ring price paid for the horse, which probably cost no more than $10k [or less]. More often than not, the nag might win a country maiden through sheer luck after 5 or 6 tries and soon after quietly disappear from the track and into a petfood can, as so many do every year. Last edited by Moderator 3 : 9th June 2009 at 08:46 AM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It was just pure luck of course but I have experienced the other side of syndicate ownership - that being we got a goodun. 5 city wins including a listed race didnt win us a fortune but the thrill of it all still gives me goose bumps.
Then reality set in with the 2nd nag I 'invested' in - a complete hack retired after 8 starts. As to syndicate ownership being a 's.cam', Im sure it can be but my experiences were the opposite with all details of the animals fully disclosed including original purchase price - sure the syndicators make a quid turning the animal around but should we expect them to do it for free? Last edited by Moderator 3 : 9th June 2009 at 08:48 AM. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() No I don't expect them to do it for free, but nor do I expect used car salesmen to do it for free either.
Last edited by crash : 9th June 2009 at 09:00 AM. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Please note: Horse racing syndicates are legal and have to act within the law. If you have information that contradicts this about any syndicate then contact the appropriate authorities. We're certainly not interested in publishing defamatory material here. From the Forum Terms of Use. "Postings that circumvent censored words. Users should not attempt to bypass the forum word censor software by altering the spelling, or any other methods." If you believe a word has been incorrectly censored then please contact us. Moderator 3. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Moderator,
No, I agree that the word that was censored was a good call by you. In hindsight I shouldn't have used it. That said, if I think there is overt profits being made above and beyond fairness [without mentioning names] in certain areas of the racing industry [or any other 'legal' industry for that matter], then that's just [my] opinion and is also a fair call, but as you point out, using a derogatory description isn't. Last edited by crash : 9th June 2009 at 09:29 AM. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() A lot of the TOP Pro,s now use Warren Blocks Field strength ratings as opposed to the Class ratings.
A better indication of a horses ability in the current race in my opinion. Cheers. darky. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|