Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 23rd June 2009, 08:31 AM
Brendon Brendon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 94
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhagwan
OK , we have read about the things we should not do.

One may notice that the folk who write these articles originally , don't seem to offer how it should be done.

Its like reading an article on what Psychologist think is abnormal but never write an article on what is normal.

Cheers.
If you par down the main issues in the OP, you end up with 4. My "cliches" answer them in racing parlance. In short: Level betting, not chasing losses, looking beyond favorites, and disciplined analysis.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 23rd June 2009, 08:58 AM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crash
A bit harsh there Bhagwan. A simple check [ 'Marcus Padley-The Melb. Age']
to see if he or does or doesn't give some good advice to winning [he can't do it for us though] wouldn't have been hard [?]



What I originally put up here was not the whole article, just the common traps. If you want the whole article or many others by Marcus Padley who writes weekly [mostly to do with share trading]. http://www.theage.com.au/execute_se...com.au&x=15&y=8

Here is some positive advice from the same guy regarding things we should be doing to improve our lot. Equally relevant for a good trader or punter, laying or betting:

Your 'part 11' Maurice :-)
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Marcus Padley
June 6, 2009

"PUT a bet on through a bookie and the reality is, if you win, they lose and, more importantly, if you lose, they win.

Work that out and you will realize that behind that flashy smile and flirtily comment the bottom line is that they want you to lose. It is in their interests that their customers lose. An ethic that would doom most businesses to the graveyard, yet after centuries of losing customers money, the bookies are still in business.

They stay in business because everyone loves to punt, needs to punt even. They stay in business because they provide an "essential service". But if they didn't make money, they wouldn't exist. So, how do they make money? Why do they make money? Learn that and maybe you too can win.

Well, it's simple. Two things.

The first is risk management. Not losing money. Bookies succeed because they put structure around risk. They manage risk. It is the same in the sharemarket with the new breed of sharemarket bookie, the contract for difference (CFD) providers. They too take the opposite side of your trade.

They will tell you that controlling risk means knowing when to hedge, who to hedge. You probably have the idea they hedge everything, but they don't. It would cost too much. Instead they simply identify people who have a habit of winning and when a winner takes a position, they hedge the risk and move the price. With CFD providers it means they differentiate between the good traders and the bad. That's why they ring you up, to suss you out. Otherwise, they just watch what you do. The winners, they hedge. The losers, they don't.

Which brings up the second reason they make money. By taking bets off losers. Off Joe Public. Off the majority. Off the people who don't take their betting seriously. People who fly by the seat of their pants. People who "love having a punt". "Love to Punt" means "Love to Lose". This is where the real money is.

There's no need to hedge losers, all they need to do is to encourage loser activity with a host of bait. Like glamorising the life of a trader - telling them how sophisticated they are. By trumpeting winners with hindsight examples, offering sexy software, free. And, most importantly of all, by making it really easy and terribly tempting to just "click and trade" and place that bet.

Amazingly enough, when it comes to making money as a do-it-yourself trader it is not the product you are up against. On the contrary; CFDs are a fantastic product for winners. What you are up against is something far more dangerous: it is you, with your feeble mind that is in no position from a standing start to be trading highly leveraged products against professionals.

So, what do you do? How do you narrow your odds?

Well, it's what you don't do first. You don't trade just because you can. Just because you can trade shares or CFDs from your kitchen doesn't mean you should. What you do do is educate yourself about what it really means to be a "trader".

Ultimately trading is a business activity. It is not glamorous or exciting.

It is methodical and routine.

It is boring. Half the game is handling risk, 40 per cent is discipline, 9 per cent is vigilance and the rest is picking winners. You can't do it part-time.

"Trader" is a title you will only gain through many losses and much experience; through constant effort and an appetite for education. As you elevate yourself from beginner to "trader" you have to try not to get wiped out. Something few achieve. That means start small, start on paper even and, meanwhile, get educated. It means doing what the professionals do and learn how to put structure around risk.

Trading is many great things: interesting, fulfilling and challenging. But it is not punting and it's not sexy or glamorous. It is business. Learn how to do it. Don't just do it".

-----------------------------------------------

Crash: Plenty of good advice there I reckon.



.."Ultimately trading is a business activity. It is not glamorous or exciting.

It is methodical and routine.

It is boring. Half the game is handling risk, 40 per cent is discipline, 9 per cent is vigilance and the rest is picking winners. You can't do it part-time".

And: "Learn how to do it. Don't just do it".
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 23rd June 2009, 12:02 PM
Mark Mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Qld
Posts: 1,400
Default

Everyone will get something different out of this article, but the most important for me was this.....The first is risk management. Not losing money. Bookies succeed because they put structure around risk. They manage risk.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 23rd June 2009, 12:07 PM
Brendon Brendon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 94
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark
Everyone will get something different out of this article, but the most important for me was this.....The first is risk management. Not losing money. Bookies succeed because they put structure around risk. They manage risk.
And where do you feel you could improve with risk management, or implement a risk management strategy when following you betting system?


(PS. I'm not allowed to say "punting". I have to say "betting system" instead, because punting now means losing, as opposed to what it meant a just short while ago in the dictionary.)

Last edited by Brendon : 23rd June 2009 at 12:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 23rd June 2009, 01:25 PM
Mark Mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Qld
Posts: 1,400
Default

Nothing to do with punting or any betting system Brendon.
The majority of my income comes from making no risk books on Betfair. But of course, as I've been told over the years, that can't be done.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 23rd June 2009, 01:39 PM
Mark Mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Qld
Posts: 1,400
Talking

And todays classic example ......
Kyneton R5 laid Always Elusive at an average price of 2.65, and backed it with IAS @ 5.50. Who cares if it wins or loses.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 23rd June 2009, 02:56 PM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default

A classical example of 'loss aversion' today. Zoe picks YASEYNITALL 27.30w r5 [?] at Kyneton [likes Linda Meech]. Halves her usual win bet because of the odds. Does the same on Sunday for a $21w and last week again on a $54 winner! I seem to be having a run of outs.

Last edited by crash : 23rd June 2009 at 03:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 23rd June 2009, 06:57 PM
Brendon Brendon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 94
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crash
A classical example of 'loss aversion' today. Zoe picks YASEYNITALL 27.30w r5 [?] at Kyneton [likes Linda Meech]. Halves her usual win bet because of the odds. Does the same on Sunday for a $21w and last week again on a $54 winner! I seem to be having a run of outs.
Have to re-jig the level stakes betting. I have done the same thing with long odds picks. But when I bet a comfortable percentage of my bank, that "gulp!" feeling isn't there.

I don't seem to have a run of outs, I am having a run of outs! A bit of bad luck coupled with wet tracks has my strike rate plummetting these past 2 weeks. One out of 4 picks came home on the weekend and it nearly covered my losses.

Last edited by Brendon : 23rd June 2009 at 07:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:47 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655