Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 29th November 2002, 01:14 PM
Mark Mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Qld
Posts: 1,400
Default

Tony
Rough figures for the last 10 Saturdays for Syd & Melb. Total races 171, winners < PP 113 or 66%, or 2 out of 3.
Total runners 1969, winners 171, = 8.7%.
Runners where open price was < PP 982, winners 113, = 11.5%, remember a few % here & there will add up over time. More interesting is having $1 win on every runner (QLD TAB) would lose $350 or 18%, as you would expect. $1 on those that opened < PP would lose only $109 or 11%. Again a few % better off but much better $$ wise. Losing 11% is doing a lot better than most of us in the tipping comp! My opinion is that this is a reasonable way to get rid of short priced fancies.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 29th November 2002, 06:22 PM
Tony Tony is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 73
Default

Thanks Mark. Is it possible its just that the horses who are in the price range whence the majority of winners come are consistently quoted over the odds by the newspaper markets? It is a very common experience on reading these odds to think , "If only, in your dreams etc."
Would need to compare horses in the PP market line by line eg see how all PP 5/2 chances fare after opening above and below this quote etc.
Still, interesting that it acted as an effective filter on Testa's bets above, albeit on this very small sample.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 29th November 2002, 10:20 PM
enjay enjay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 203
Default

You did not hear this from me, but I have it on very good authority that PP prices are worked out at The Rating Bureau (Marcel Plante) and handed to the various outlets, and I am also told that the actual paper prices are NOT the originals as supplied. If
Sports editors do not like the original figures they are changed. Any forum member with the GTS program should be able to vouch for this.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 1st December 2002, 10:11 PM
Mark Mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Qld
Posts: 1,400
Default

The prices in the weekend Australian are the same as the Courier Mail, obviously the same owners.
I know it's only a small sample, the last 11 weeks, but favourites (paper) that opened the same or > PP, 113 bets, showed a loss of 13.6 units (12%) while those that opened shorter, 85 bets, profited by 2.7 units (3%). This is on QLD TAB div's & flat stakes. Betting with the bookies would have been a larger profit. Yesterday, 14 of 16 opened shorter than PP, backing every runner lost 65 units or 36%, backing only those that opened shorter made 14 units or 15%. I have incorporated this fact into what I do & yesterday alone my increase in POT was 12% on what I would have made.
:grin:
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:35 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655