|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
You'd be betting $226 to win $793.
$783 is what you would have lost at the end of a 13 run series if it looses. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll go kick my dog and get back to you .................
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I hope not your darkydog!
__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.” ― Earl Nightingale |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
LOL, say sorry to your dog. I think I see what you are getting at, different wavelengths here. But yes effectively you are on the 13th you are risking 783 to win $10...... |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
As I posted in another thread, a mate of mine did a packet chasing shortpriced NRL favourites betting on them in a manner not too different to that suggested in the blog.
Not saying it cant be done...just never seen anyone come close to doing it & as pointed out by others, big amounts are being risked to win a pittance & thats just nuts IMHO. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
The guy lost all credibility when he started saying that black jack card counting was useless, yeah right i don't see baccarat players being banned from casinos.
This is just loss chasing and doomed to failure. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nah, not different wavelengths thorn, just the old brain about to explode ..... wots left of it that is.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|