Ah yes, Ahjay's system. Well it never proved to be a winner for me and I guess many others seeing as no one keeps raving on about it. It was a favourite of Darkydog's many moons ago. As for Bhagwan's systems, there are so many that one wouldn't know where to start.

Anyway, answer me Barny, do you have the results to prove that these systems are profitable, or are you just presuming they are because the system rules suit your personality?

IF you're talking about the 200+ systems I mentioned on here, OR those that show an excellent POT, then NO I don't have results to prove that ALL of them are profitable.

Regarding your second question ..... My thread was based on DYOR, that's the second time I've had to mention this to you. Do Your Own Research - in anyone's language (no semantics) is the opposite of presumption !!!! ...... bernie !!!

Maybe it's you I'm helping save from yourself bernie ..... you're welcome, lol.

and bernie ..... punters are wired for the 5 / 1 pop. Whack on a ton and get $600 back. The notion of 20% POT with a run of outs somewhere will GUARANTEE that 99% will run for the hills when a few losers pop up in a row.

Treat this as a business and you're a chance.

and one more thing bernie ..... I think you know quite a bit about this caper, you little squirrel !!!!! lol

You're quite right about doing your own research Barny. For some unknown reason, people don't give you EVERYTHING on a platter

P.S. Welcome back Barny. Great to hear from you again.

__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.”

― Earl Nightingale

Hi Barny.
Just realized you were back from a spell.

Hope the health is ok.

Cheers.
Garyf.

Your dead right there Barny about the Do Your Own Reserch.

How many times have we experienced say a system that does well for 3 months, then breaks even for the next 3 months.

If one does not check these things , we will not know if its what we were expecting.
It may have too many bets for our liking.
It may have too fewer bets to our liking.
Long runs of outs may not be to our liking.

To those Punters who blindly bet any system that is written without back checking ..
STOP doing that.
Do some back checking.
Do some dry runs for at least 150 bets & go from there.
Just because it worked say 10 years ago , does not mean it would still work today.

Work out the longest run of outs you expect, then add 100 to it , so as to work out size of betting bank to be used.
If betting level stakes.

Punting is not an exact science so try & be prepared for the worst at all times.

__________________
Cheers.

Well said Bgahwan.

The other thing I,d add is to look outside the square.

If you do what everyone else does you,ll get what everyone else gets - a cold soggy pie and the bus fare home.

Cheers
darky

This is exactly the area I have a problem with your posts, regarding systems darkydog2002. None of them look outside the sqaure, they're all related to ratings, short prices etc, you were incessantly banging on about 55kg+ from Malcolm Knowles research. Of all the posters on here, you are the one who keeps regurgitating the same old, same old, ......

Please direct me to one piece of information you've posted that could be considered outside the square.

Not looking for an argument or to be TOU'd but your suggestion of looking outside the square flies in the face of 99% of your posts darkydog2002.

Quite true Barny.
Most of my posts are to do with ratings and using commonsense with them.
And they are still my bread and butter .BUT as every top class professional (if their honest ) will tell you that the bulk of their profits yearly come from the occasional Longshot .
The silliest thing in this game is restricting yourself to a odds range.
i.e $3 - $10.

And this is touted over and over again.Its simply untrue and restricting the amount of profit one earns in a year.

If a horse is considered a good thing and the totes /bookies are offering a massive price I accept it greedily.

Cheers
darky