Uni/Tatts Ratings always have been limited in their accuracy & usefulness imho

__________________
"Now let me get this straight - Whatever I do don't bet this horse?"

Ah Domenic.
A sane punter at last.
Thank you.
Cheers
darky

This is statement of the month!! Well Done

domenic posted .....

I have been using ratings for around 25 years. If during that time I backed my top rated horse only, I would have been broke years ago. That's confirmation that ratings cannot pick winners at such odds that allow you to win. Exactly what I've been saying for as long as ..... and I've given reasons why.

From my point of view I use ratings to sort out the main chances in the race, and if I consider it a betting race then the market will dictate if I bet or not. I really don't understand what you're saying here dominic. Are you suggesting that you only look at certain races to bet on, or are you saying that you have a minimum price with which you'll bet on ?

It is extremely difficult to profit long term from backing only 1 horse per race, unless you have a lot of patience. I've never understood the logic behind this theory. Can you elaborate please ?

And to Vortech, what exactly is it that makes this the statement of the month. There's no substance to it.

There's no info there darkydog2002, just your tips. What good is that to man or beast ?! If I'm to be lured to the dark side, then I need some information and a breakdown of results, the hows whys and whats of the Rating System. Which one do you recommend Darkydog2002 ?? Genuinely interested here .....