|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If I was to go without a Winner for 20 races , I would simply inflammate myself ( that thing where you poor petrol over yourself then ignite it) But what you say is true Star - just doesn't suit me. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Or what did the trainers say about their horse or the others?
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's my contribution, eliminate any horse that has not won in the conditions. Unfortunately this means that you can't decide on whether you bet or not until not long before the race but all the statistics i've looked at in my endeavors to find a profitable system show that if a horse hasn't ran or won in the conditions previously theres a good chance it wont win this time around. Obviously horses have to win in conditions at some stage to meet this rule but as I generally do my ratings on quality races with horses that have had at least 3-4 starts it seems to work quite well.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Would you be looking at rules to improve strike rate or return?
Interesting Facts: 57% of winning horses finished 1st, 2nd and 3rd in previous race. 71% of winners were 4 or older 76% of winners were male 73% of winners raced within previous 14 days 78% of winners carried the same weight or less at their last race 84% of winners ran in the same class or lower at their last race 49% of winners ran the same distance as last start 63% of winners finished within 2L last start But the problem here is in combination they don't necessarily improve or if you bet outside these variable ranges you can often find so much more value. Last edited by Vortech : 25th January 2013 at 06:52 PM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
A few years ago, I would agree totally. Today, I am not so sure. I think we might have to now factor in the trainer and his training set up. Most trainers have become more scientific, have better facilities and have better access to the actual physiolgy of the horse and its recovery from stress which includes ,racing, training and viruses. A horses ability to recover after a first up run depends on its state of fitness going into that first race. Years ago most trainers used races to get their horses fit, today, only the less sophisticated do that or those trainers that do not have full facilities available to them. The top and better trainers have all their horses pre trained for them, so when they arrive in the stable they are fit and ready to race. Their recovery rate is the same or maybe slightly less then a race fit horse. So, by being a little bit patient for the second up the horse will come to hand a lot quicker. Because of a different training stratergy then years ago, horses come to hand a lot quicker. Statistics might prove me wrong, but I am fairly confident I am on the right track. Pete |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree Star, especially in Sydney.
More so now than in the past, Sydney trained horses seem to have more trials leading to their first up run and are therefore fitter when having their second up run. Following the patterns of certain stables may be the key here. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|