|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ive attached a listing of the Favourites and the S/R per venue since 2002. I've only included the venues with 200 or more races
cheers |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If you also add average field size for each track, you'll see a direct correlation.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software. Now with over 419,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races! http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html *RaceCensus now updated to 31/05/2025 Video overview of RaceCensus here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() So should one run a test of the strike rates of favourites per field sizes.
Then run the average field sizes per track. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() No I don't think that's necessary, just average field size per track and add that to the csv output. With some exceptions, mostly there's a direct correlation.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software. Now with over 419,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races! http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html *RaceCensus now updated to 31/05/2025 Video overview of RaceCensus here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
__________________
At the feast of ego everyone leaves hungry |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Vortech, do you have favourites broken down to classes eg mdns, etc.
Wet tracks eliminate a lot of favourites as does distance beyond 1400m. Large fields also cause concern to favourites. We need to know under what conditions favourites win
__________________
At the feast of ego everyone leaves hungry |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|